Two diametrically opposed editorials appeared Friday in newspapers in Canada and the U.S.
• Under the headline
"Don't Go to Cuba," The National Post of Canada tells tourists that Cuba is "a nation where the worst excesses of authoritarianism remain as entrenched as ever."
The Post cites the recently released Human Rights Watch poll as it remarks that "in Raúl's Cuba, as in Fidel's, unemployment is considered antisocial and the government can lock away anyone a summary trial finds guilty of 'dangerousness,' a legal catch-all.
"Once incarcerated, political prisoners are denied medical care, family visits and legal aid," The Post goes on. "Solitary confinement is a common and seemingly arbitrary form of discipline." And the editorial concludes: "Canadians should not be subsidizing this tyranny – directly or indirectly. If you want sun, try Miami, the Dominican Republic or St. Lucia. Don't go to Cuba." (For full text,
click here.)
• Under the headline
"Cuba's Isolation Begets Abuses," The Boston Globe editorial board states that "the fundamental fallacy underlying U.S. policy toward Cuba is that isolation forces transformation. The most glaring proof that the 50-year embargo has failed is that the Cuban regime remains profoundly repressive."
The Globe also cites the HRW's condemnation of the Castro government but comes to a different conclusion.
"As more Americans enter Cuba, so, too, will information and ideas that foster dissent and that undermine Castro’s ability to use the United States as a scapegoat for his repressive policies. And when the United States lifts the embargo – a policy that hurts Cuba’s poor and makes the island appear a victim of a rich, bullying neighbor – it will gain the credibility in Latin America to negotiate the release of Cuba’s political prisoners.
"If the repressive Cuban regime is to come to an end, it will not be through isolation, but through exposure to the ideals and virtues of free societies. Congress should act now on [the] proposal to lift the travel ban and promote progress in Cuba. It should be a first step toward eliminating the embargo, a damaging policy that has never borne its intended result." (For full text,
click here.)
–Renato Pérez Pizarro, with thanks to Juan O. Tamayo.