BOSTON -- Jacques Martin was part of a conference call today (I missed out because I was stuck flying today. But good news: USAir starts giving out free soda and water in coach come March 1!)
With the trade deadline rapidly approaching (Florida's final game of this five-game roadie is March 3; the deadline is the following day) and JM the GM spoke at length about what's going on with Jay and the Panthers.
A report out of Philadelphia says that the Panthers don't want to take back any money in a potential Bouwmeester deal. This would jibe with a report Ottawa's Bruce Garrioch offered up a few months ago.
If this is indeed the case (and I'm pretty sure it is not), here's my take: The Panthers are struggling financially and don't want to add payroll. If Jay is traded, only a fraction of his salary would go to the new team. If Jay is traded after the Atlanta game, there would be 18 games left. That means Jay is due just over a million bones. But, in this economy, a million bucks is a million bucks.
That said, a million is not that much -- in the hockey world -- so the Panthers could just keep him. But another couple of employees were let go recently. They are trying to save money all over, and, well, Jay is a very well paid employee. The ones the Panthers have let go are not.
Financials aside, let's look at what the Panthers have if they don't get a veteran player in return and just go the draft pick/prospect route: JM must feel confident that No. 7 defenseman Noah Welch can step in and play OK.
Of course, if the Panthers don't get anything back, someone has to come up from Rochester.
My money is on Jason Garrison. JM really seems to like this rookie, and by all accounts, he's been playing well for the Amerks. Spoke to JM about him a few weeks ago and he had a lot of good things to day, mostly, that if Florida needed a d-man, he would be the guy. Keaton Ellerby could also be an option, but Garrison is an older guy (he played at Minnesota-Duluth) and did well in his one game with the Panthers.
I'm not implying the Panthers think either player is the next Jay Bouwmeester, nor do they think either is close to that elite level. But they might think they can survive with those two.
Are these good options? Don't think so. Not for today. Tomorrow maybe. But this franchise has had too many promises of tomorrow.
And, for the record, JM has told me and said today in his Q&A that he wants to help the franchise today. That would mean a team has to overwhelm JM to make any kind of deal. And money would be coming back along with some mix of draft picks and prospects.
But I'm hearing this ''no money coming back'' from too many places to dismiss it. We'll see what happens.
Does JM believe Jay will resign? ''I don't know how much belief.''
Hey, the Panthers could just resign Jay and that would be that. Speaking of that, the top photo is courtesy of BarryMelroseRocks.com...funny post on Jay here....
Here's part of the transcript, courtesy of the NHL. Key quotes (in my opinion) in bold italics:
DAVID
KEON: We now have with us Florida Panthers general manager Jacques
Martin. Jacques will be involved in his 15th NHL trade deadline next
week. The Panthers currently have a record of 30-21-8 for 68 points,
good for second in the Southeast Division and the seventh seed in the
Eastern Conference playoff race.
Q. In general for the trade deadline or the summer, you guys are in a
playoff berth, but unfortunately your power play is 26th in the
league. Would you be resorting to looking for these type of players in
general to help out those situations?
They
are coming off a week where they shut out two of the top seeds in the
Eastern Conference, Boston and New Jersey. Thanks to Jacques for
joining us. We'll open it up for questions now.
JACQUES MARTIN: Well, I think we appreciate our fans a great deal, but
I think from a management standpoint, you can't manage your franchise
or your hockey team according to the fans. I think we have people that
evaluate our team on a daily basis. The last couple years we've tried
to build a team that would put this franchise in the playoffs moving
forward, and we evaluate areas that we need to improve, and when you
get into a trading deadline like next week, you probably look to
improve your club for the stretch drive if you can, or at the same
time, I think we like our hockey club. We think our hockey club has
grown a great deal since last summer. We've made a lot of moves in the
offseason, a lot of acquisition, and we feel that our team is
improving as the season is moving along.
Q. Given the answer to that question, can you give us an update then on
where you are with Jay in terms of bringing him under contract, if it's
still an option? And if you don't think it is realistically between now
and July 1st, what's your strategy moving forward with an eye to
maximizing your assets for the future?
So
depending on what's available, if it's a good transition, if we feel we
can improve certain areas of our hockey club, then that would be a
possibility. But I think there's also a possibility that we retain Jay,
then we see where we're at after the season.
Q. Does that suggest any kind of package you would be looking at
between now and March 4th, you would need somebody to come in and play
in your line?up, whether it was to bolster your offense or wherever,
but you would need someone to play now as opposed to a package that was
strictly futures?
JACQUES MARTIN: Yeah, I think as I stated in my first sentence when
I made the fact that I want our club to improve. If we trade Jay
Bouwmeester, we need to have somebody in return to help our club going
down the stretch.






Nice session of Q&A. As a renewed SSH (miniplan), I hope Alan Cohen doesn't decide to get all cheap on us now (and next year)!
I understand the economics of the game and the possibility of the cap being reduced but man, what a punch to the stomach of the fans if ownership starts acting like the not-so-distant past, and makes uneven trades just to reduce payroll! Sure, we don't have much leverage here with JayBo being an UFA, but there's always some GM out there who will make a sucker trade.
I hope JayBo resigns and fast. But if the Quiet One holds out and JM has a trading partner, I really really hope we get more than just prospects and draft picks. Fans are sick of that game...we've been doing that dance for almost a decade now. Hey JM, Garrison and Ellerby CANNOT play anywhere as good as JayBo.
Man, very very frustrating!
Posted by: EJ | February 23, 2009 at 10:26 PM
EJ of course "Garrison and Ellerby CANNOT play anywhere as good as JayBo." Most defenseman can't that is why he would keep him for playoffs UNLESS as he says, "that we improve our hockey club." meaning they get back a player that can help now such as a top scoring center. All the defensemen move up a slot and our defense may be a lttle weaker but our forwards win more faceoffs and score more goals which makes up for losing Boumeester. No one expects Garrison or Ellerby to fill Bou's skates but if we have a center that scores more goals we may spend less time in our own end. It would be a trade off Defense for forward scoring.
Posted by: Bo | February 23, 2009 at 11:08 PM
Get a centerman and give Noah Welch a chance! Stop asking if Bo is going to sign- he wants out or he already would have signed. Do you sit and get nothing in return for Bo when he leaves at the end of the season? That's foolish. The two youngest D are Noah and Bo. We might lose them both if JM isn't smart. The only D under contract for next season are Ballard, Allen and McCabe. Make the playoffs but focus on the future. The Cats aren't winning the cup this year.
Posted by: fanniemae | February 23, 2009 at 11:35 PM
They got me watching again
Posted by: thejuandiggler | February 24, 2009 at 01:18 AM
GR: don't forget how tight lipped JM is, even when he talks about the person/player/coach/subject in question.
None of us saw PDB being our new coach. None.
JM by now, should have a reputation of, "whatever he says, it doesn't mean anything. It could be the absolute truth, it could be the complete opposite, or it could be just miscellaneous banter." I know you've said before that this guy holds his cards close to the chest, and i think reading too much into any interview is rather futile at this point.
Either way, thanks for the info!
Posted by: Holy Jokinen | February 24, 2009 at 09:18 AM
I have to respect JM on this. He's dealing with difficult/impossible negotiations and as much as he wants to tell his side, he's being a pro and respecting Bouw's privacy. The truth will come out eventually, but it's obvious that JM could offer $7m/yr for 10 years and Bouw's camp would simply take that to other teams as a negotiation tool.
I think the "Not taking salary back" is JM's code for "We're not going to be a dumping ground for overpaid players with unwieldy contracts like Drury, Gomez, etc." This is also a smart move. No need to bail other teams out of their mistakes.... JM will take a high-priced player but only if there's comparable skill.
If the new CBA allowed teams to eat salary, this would be different.
Posted by: JimH | February 24, 2009 at 09:35 AM
Fanniemae, I bet u didn't think edmonton the 8th seed 2 yrs won't make it to the finals, or the 96 panthers, eh?
Posted by: Jh | February 24, 2009 at 09:37 AM
I think if the week before the trade deadline for Bo to decide is true, that allows JM to let other teams negotiate with him and maximize our return. A signed Bo will bring this organization a HUGE return. HUGE!
From the looks of the interview it doesn't look hopefully at all that Bo will stay here. So I trust JM to do what's best for the organization and make a monster trade that will help now and in the future.
Posted by: Big Slap Shot Bob | February 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM
What's the word on Craig Anderson and David Booth? Could they possibly be trade bait?
Posted by: pantherfan | February 24, 2009 at 12:56 PM