« Video | Flying Straight? Same-sex Penguin Couple Splits | Main | Photo gallery | Nial Martin’s ‘His Double Life’ plays Caleb Auditorium in Miami »

Same-sex couples seek immigration benefit

By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press

Immigration_Same_Sex_Couples_sff_embedded_prod_affiliate_56 WASHINGTON -- Judy Rickard took an early retirement and a reduced pension so she could be assured of more time with her partner, a British citizen whose stays in the U.S. are limited to six months.

Rickard, 61, would have preferred to keep working at San Jose State University and sponsor her partner, Karin Bogliolo, for residency in the United States, just as heterosexual couples can. But U.S. law does not allow for that.

"If you're going to have a system that's designed to keep families together, it should focus on keeping families together," Rickard said.

That could soon change, as more than 100 lawmakers in the House and about 20 in the Senate have signed onto bills that would add the United States to the 19 countries that already recognize same-sex couples for immigration purposes.

Gay rights groups are encouraged that President Barack Obama has signaled that he would like to include couples like Rickard and Bogliolo in the bills.

"In many ways, the stars are aligning to move this forward as part of a comprehensive bill," said Steve Ralls, communications director for the advocacy group Immigration Equality. "That's an opportunity we didn't have years ago."

The provisions concerning same-sex couples are part of legislation that would increase the number of visas provided to family members of people already in the United States legally.

The long-standing fight over the country's estimated 36,000 same sex couples of two nationalities is a small but emotional part of the debate over immigration reform. But including same-sex couples in the mix could make it harder to pass an immigration overhaul.

A key ally in past immigration fights, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said it would not support a measure that has a same-sex provision.

Writing to Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., the organization said the provision would "erode the institution of marriage and family by according marriage-like immigration benefits to same sex relationships."

Other groups say that it is often difficult to verify the validity of same-sex relationships if one of the partners comes from a country that does not recognize or document same-sex unions.

Honda, lead author of the "Reuniting Families Act," credited Rickard, one of his constituents, for bringing the issue to his attention. Honda said his Japanese heritage contributed to his taking a closer look at protecting same-sex couples through an overhaul of the nation's immigration law.

Japanese-Americans were sent to internment camps during the fallout from Pearl Harbor and redefined as persons of enemy alien ancestry, Honda said.

"The lack of political leadership played a big part in what happened to us," Honda said. "And that's true in almost every civil rights case."

Another California resident, Shirley Tan, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month in favor of a comparable bill.

Tan has been in California since arriving on a visitor's visa in 1989. She applied for asylum in 1995 because she was afraid of a cousin in the Philippines who had killed her mother and sister and critically wounded her.

She was unaware the petition had been denied until federal agents took her away in handcuffs at the end of January. Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California has since sponsored a bill that allows Tan to stay in the U.S. until the current session of Congress ends in late 2010.

"I have a partner who is a U.S. citizen, and two beautiful children who are also U.S. citizens, but not one of them can petition for me to remain in the United States with them," Tan said.

The NAACP and the American Bar Association also spoke in favor of including "permanent partners" as part of an immigration bill, saying that current law amounts to discrimination.

Permanent partner is defined in proposed legislation as an individual 18 or older who is "in a committed, intimate relationship with another individual 18 or older in which both individuals intend a lifelong commitment."

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said he doubted the legislation would pass this Congress. He said it amounts to a redefinition of marriage and would give people more opportunities to come into the United States fraudulently.

"It seems we would be creating a special preference and benefit for a category of immigrants based on a relationship that's not recognized by federal law and overwhelmingly by most states," Sessions said.

Rickard said she may reluctantly move to Great Britain or another country when her partner's current travel visa expires in November. Bogliolo, however, said she would prefer to live in the U.S. for her partner's sake.

"Judy has elderly parents and family here and she's also lived here all her life whereas I've lived in many different countries," Bogliolo said. "I think Judy would find it very difficult after a whole life in San Jose to move over to Europe, so I decided if at all possible that I would move over here."

Caption: In this Thursday, July 2, 2009 photo, Judy Rickard, left, with her partner, Karin Bogliolo, right, sit at their dining room table at their home in San Jose, Calif. Facing a painful separation, Rickard, 61, retired early from her job at San Jose State University this past April and took a reduced pension so that she could spend more time with her partner, Bogliolo, a citizen of Great Britain who is allowed to stay in the U.S. for up to six months at a time. It was not the preferred option. Rickard wanted to keep working and sponsor Bogliolo for residency in the United States, just as married heterosexual couples can. But U.S. law does not allow for that. Paul Sakuma / AP Photo

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b26169e2011572168b67970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Same-sex couples seek immigration benefit:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ike and Mike and Julie and Shirley are just wrong in my opinon. But even more so than even that reality, is my right to say so! See you in the judgement. My prayer for each of you is that at some point before leaving this earth all sinneres repent. Each night (and all day long, to for that matter)I pray for God to forgive me of my sin. And, just as God does, I love all people, even people who choose to sexualize with people who are made like them. I love you!


Shakespeare

The religious stuff aside, this will open the door to even MORE immigration fraud, especially in the fraud capital of the world, Florida.
Will polygamous muslims be allowed to bring multiple wives here, and get benefits for all of them?

oh boy! three hateful bigots at once. Where to begin...

Shakespeare; Don't pray for me. Don't pray for anyone unless they ask you too. God knew I was gay before I did. He won't condemn me to anything because, A. It's not a sin. And B. God doesn't make junk, and I am not junk. I asked God into my heart years ago, and he remains. He hasn't abandoned me yet, and I don't think he ever will. God hates divorce though, look it up.

Oh Boy; What fraud is committed when two people who love each other dearly want to be together? If you were to travel to another country and met the partner (I can't tell what gender you are,) of your dreams and moved them here, would that be fraud? Read the definition in the story. it includes people of every sexual orientation, including heterosexuals.

Mr.Mumbo-Jumbo; Greaseballls? Tacoville? Can we say issue-ville? Your hatred exceeds limits of humanity. Go seek out a therapist before your hatred gives you a stroke.

The freaks are not "same sex" couples, as Sex is the reproductive act!
They are IDENTICAL GENDERs.
The gender is the same- two males, or two females. Identical Gender Couples.
Sex couples, or normal couples, or couples are just normal.

Sex is more than a reproductive act, and if you are married, or have a partner, than you should know that it is also the ultimate form of intimacy.
And if sex was just for procreation, we'd never have prostitutes, right?

AND what about the heterosexual couples that cannot bear children? Should they not be allowed to be togther? Or old couples?

There are close to 7 billion, with a "B" people on this planet. I think that the reproductive duties have been fulfilled, thank you. Also, at estimates of 11% of the world's population being homosexual, and my estimate about 5% heterosexual couples who for some reason or another will not have kids, that leaves 84% to pick up the slack. And judging by the amount of kids I see in my neighborhood, and in stores I think you guys are doing pretty well.
My theory is thus. Some, not all people have a deep rooted fear that either they are gay themselves, or they feel that if gay marriage is legitimatized, then gay people will pop out of the woodwork and start hitting on them, or something. That is furthest from reality. Just like anybody else on this planet, we have particular things that we find attractive in a partner. Not everybody loves redheads, for example. And if a gay person approaches you, just like if someone you find unattractive does the same, it would be easy to rebuff them. We are just like everybody else, with the exception of one physical trait. I wish you guys would see that. Just because I am gay, and want an official recognization of MONOGAMY, doesn't mean I intend to do anything unforward to anybody else. Guys when you get married, you stop dating other women, right?

Vikingwarbrides and Ralphy:
My intent was not to ge you all riled up. I am not the judge and do not look down on anyone in any way shape form or fashion. Please recognize the fact that I, simply, do not see this in the manner in which you do.

Shakespeare

The comments to this entry are closed.