« Generational Alliance youth groups: 'We need action on more than just jobs and debt’ | Main | Feds seek to overturn Mexico City gay marriage law »

Obama urges repeal of ban on open gays in military; McCain: ‘Now is not the time’

By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is urging Congress to repeal the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military, but Democratic allies and Republican opponents alike are criticizing his approach.

Obama's effort to eliminate the "don't ask, don't tell" practice faces resistance not just from Congress, but also from the Pentagon, where some top officials have been strident in their support for the Clinton-era policy.

"This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are," Obama said Wednesday during his State of the Union address. "It's the right thing to do."

The statement drew a standing ovation from Congress and from Defense Secretary Robert Gates, but it fell short for gay activists.

An organization representing service members who had been dismissed called on Obama to push a repeal in the upcoming Pentagon budget, and Clinton's adviser on gay issues called Obama's performance in the first year "an almost complete disaster."

Kevin Nix, communications director at the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said the group wants Obama to repeal the policy the same way Clinton introduced it in 1993 - through the defense authorization bill.

"We very much need a sense of urgency to get this done in 2010," said Nix, whose group estimates more that 13,500 gays and lesbians have been dismissed since 1994. "What is also needed is more attention and leadership to win repeal."

Richard Socarides, a Clinton adviser who has been a vocal critic of how Obama has handled gay constituents, was less reserved.

"In 1999, Bill Clinton became the first president ever to talk about gay rights in a State of the Union address. Eleven years later, not much has changed," Socarides said. Talking again about ending the policy "without a moratorium on the witch hunts and expulsions and without even a plan for future action just won't cut it," he said.

"Look, we are not second-class citizens and our rights are not second-term problems," he said.

Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said Obama should have announced a suspension of dismissals.

"The time for broad statements is over. The time to get down to business is overdue. We wish we had heard him speak of concrete steps tonight," Carey said.

Obama's relationship with the gay community has been rocky since his election. Gays and lesbians objected to the invitation of evangelist Rev. Rick Warren to participate in Obama's inauguration because of Warren's support for repealing gay marriage in California.

As president, Obama hasn't taken any concrete steps urging the repeal of the policy that allows gays and lesbians to serve in the military as long as they don't disclose their sexual orientation or act on it. Some former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have acknowledged the policy is flawed, and Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen signed off on a journal article that called for lifting the ban.

Yet Mullen's lawyers have urged a delay that could go into the middle of the next presidential election year.

"Now is not the time," the in-house advisers for Mullen wrote recently in a memorandum. "The importance of winning the wars we are in, along with the stress on the force, our body of knowledge and the number of unknowns, demand that we act with deliberation."

Mullen received the conflicting advice this month about whether to move quickly to lift the 1993 ban, and it is not clear what he will recommend to Obama. Although allowing gays to serve openly in the military was one of Obama's campaign promises, the issue was put on a back burner during his first year in office. Some liberal supporters and several congressional Democrats are pushing for action.

The top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee urged Obama to listen to the uniforms.

"No action to change the law should be taken by the administration or by this Congress until we have a full and complete understanding of the reasons why the current law threatens or undermines readiness in any significant way," Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., wrote to Mullen and Gates, "whether a change in law will improve readiness in measurable ways, and what the implications for and effects on military readiness, cohesion, morale, good order and discipline are entailed with a change in law."

Republican Sen. John McCain, a prisoner of war during Vietnam and Obama's opponent in the 2008 presidential race, said the policy has been successful.

"At a time when our armed forces are fighting and sacrificing on the battlefield, now is not the time to abandon the policy," said McCain, R-Ariz.

Associated Press writers Kimberly Hefling and Anne Gearan contributed to this report.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b26169e20120a81ca1b6970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama urges repeal of ban on open gays in military; McCain: ‘Now is not the time’:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Once again, Sen. John McCain reminds us why some of us voted for Barack Obama. No matter how disappointing or infuriating Obama is, the alternative would have been worse.


And, by the way, if McCain was president, last week's Supreme Court decision would have been 6-3 instead of 5-4.

Saying "now is not the time" is not the same thing as calling the policy "successful," and I have to wonder if the reporter actually has a quote from McCain in which he calls the policy "successful." McCain is not anti-gay, but I think it's prudent to move deliberately on the issue while we're in the middle of two wars.

There's also been a great deal of confusion in this debate between the law that bans gays from the military and "don't ask, don't tell." DADT was an executive policy instituted by Clinton respecting enforcement of the ban, but my understanding is that removing the ban would require passage of a law by Congress. Am I incorrect?

Btw, Jesse, and Steve I wish you would make people more aware of this: The part of the McCain-Feingold bill that the Supreme Court overturned, last week, prevented not just corporations but organizations such as GLAAD from airing independent endorsements of candidates in the last two weeks before an election. I don't understand how anyone could view such a law as anything other than a violation of the 1st Amendment. Has partisanship gotten so terrible that we can't face such fundamental truths?

The comments to this entry are closed.