« Liza Minnelli: 'Mickey was somebody that everybody loved, but to me he was part of the family' | Main | Egypt court gives men 3-8 years for homosexuality »

Supreme Court rejects appeal over gay bias case; ruling stands that photographer violated human rights act

BY JERI CLAUSING
ASSOCIATED PRESS

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from a studio that refused to photograph a lesbian couple's commitment ceremony, letting stand a New Mexico high court ruling that helped spur a national debate over gay rights and religious freedom.

The justices left in place a unanimous state Supreme Court ruling last year that said Elane Photography violated New Mexico's Human Rights Act by refusing to photograph the same-sex ceremony "in the same way as if it had refused to photograph a wedding between people of different races."

Elane Photography co-owner Elaine Huguenin said taking the photos for Vanessa Willock and her partner would violate her religious beliefs. She said she also has a right of artistic expression under the First Amendment that allows her to choose what pictures to take, or refrain from taking.

She was ordered to pay more than $7,000 in attorneys' fees, which Willock waived.

The case has been cited as lawmakers in other states have proposed legislation exempting people from such lawsuits if doing business with same-sex couples violates their religious beliefs.

Click here to read more.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.