'Some Men' cast photos from Saturday night

I attended Saturday night's sold-out performance of Terrence McNally's Some Men at Rising Action Theatre in Oakland Park. The production is directed by David Goldyn, with an assist by Jerry Jensen, and runs through Nov. 2.

Here are a few cast pictures I took after the performance (click photos to enlarge):

Some_men_001_3

Co-stars John Hernandez, David Leddick and Joseph Long.

Some_men_002

The complete cast: Front row from left: Larry Williams, Daniel Lugo and John Hernandez. Back row from left: Larry Brooks, Ricardo Rodriguez, David Leddick, Joseph Long, Ted Dvoracek.

To read Drama Queen Christine Dolen's review of the play, click here.

Vote 'No' on marriage amendment, Miami Herald recommends

The Miami Herald today recommends that Floridians vote NO on the state marriage amendment. Here's the recommendation:

No. 2: Marriage protection

Florida law already prohibits what this amendment seeks to ban: gay marriage. So the only thing it would do is enshrine discrimination in our state constitution. This amendment is mean-spirited and misguided.

It targets gay and lesbian couples, but it would cause grief and suffering to other couples, whether they're gay or not. That's because of ambiguous language that says any legal union that is the ''substantial equivalent'' of marriage would not be recognized.

This would jeopardize the benefits and health insurance that many companies provide to unmarried, heterosexual couples.

The amendment threatens the property rights of elderly people who live together for convenience, economics and safety. Hospital-visitation rights of unmarried couples would be at risk. The amendment doesn't protect marriage and threatens many lifestyle choices.

We recommend a NO vote.

Video | National Coming Out Day with Perez Hilton

From HRC:

Perez Hilton and other notable LGBT people discuss the importance of living openly and honestly.

Coming out would have positive or no impact, say nearly 9 of 10 heterosexuals

News release from Witeck-Combs Communications:

New online study also shows nearly 7 out 10 heterosexuals said they prefer an individual be open and honest about being gay, rather than feel the need to hide their orientation

Washington, DC – October 10, 2008 – According to a new national survey, nearly nine out of 10 (87%) heterosexuals said that if someone were to come out to them as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, it would have a positive or no impact on how they would view gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people. The survey also revealed that two out of three (67%) heterosexual adults agree that if someone they knew is gay or lesbian, they’d want that individual to be open and honest with them about it, rather than feel the need to hide who he or she really is. 

The new nationwide survey of 2,455 U.S. adults, (ages 18 and over), of whom 287 self identified as gay or lesbian (which includes an oversample of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adults), was conducted online between September 15-22, 2008, by Harris Interactive, a global market research and consulting firm, in conjunction with Witeck-Combs Communications, Inc., a strategic public relations and marketing communications firm with special expertise in the GLBT market.

A large majority of gay and lesbian adults disclose that they are “out” and honest with others about their sexual orientation. The survey showed that four out of five (80%) gay and lesbian adults consider themselves “out” as a gay or lesbian person. In terms of their relationships, 95 percent of gay and lesbian adults consider themselves open about their sexual orientation to their close friends, compared to 79 percent of all GLBT respondents. Nearly eight out 10 (79%) gay and lesbian adults consider themselves open about their sexual orientation with their acquaintances/casual friends, compared to 61 percent of all GLBT respondents.

When it comes to the workplace, a significant majority (67%) of gay and lesbian adults reported being open about their sexual orientation with their co-workers/colleagues, compared with 49 percent of all GLBT respondents.     In terms of their purchasing decisions, nearly two-thirds (64%) of gay and lesbian adults reported that when selecting a product or service, all other considerations being equal, they will select the brand that has a reputation for being more gay friendly.

“The decision to come out is never an easy one, but the numbers today reflect a rapidly improving culture that is more accepting,” said Wes Combs, President of Witeck-Combs Communications. “Much of corporate America has taken a leadership role in establishing a culture of acceptance and equality. In return, many gay and lesbian Americans are rewarding them and sustaining them with their customer loyalty – a valuable relationship during these very tough economic conditions.”

This data is especially timely, as the nation is about to celebrate National Coming Out Day on October 11th. Every year, GLBT Americans are encouraged to be open and honest about who they are as a way of helping to break down negative stereotypes GLBT people. “The data helps to confirm what we have known for years – a majority of our friends and coworkers want us to be honest about who we are,” said Betsy Pursell, Human Rights Campaign VP of Education and Outreach. “GLBT people fear others will reject them and I hope that this data will give comfort and strength to those who are looking to take their next step in the coming out process.”

$300,000 award to bullied gay and lesbian high school students upheld

Lambda Legal news release:

‘My experience at Poway was just three years of my life I’d love to forget’

(San Diego, October 10, 2008) --- In a 3-0 decision, the California Court of Appeal (Fourth District) today upheld a jury decision that found that Poway Unified School District officials took minimal or no action at all when two Poway High School students were subjected to relentless harassment because they are gay and lesbian.  The ruling upheld an award of $300,000 to Megan Donovan and Joey Ramelli under the state education code.

“We’re pleased the court today recognized that every student has a right to feel safe and protected at school,” said Lambda Legal Senior Staff Attorney Brian Chase.  “Unfortunately, what happened to Megan and Joey is far from uncommon.  We hope this lawsuit and the attention it has generated will remind school officials everywhere that parents expect their kids to be safe from bullying and violence during school hours.”

Ramelli and Donovan were students at Poway High School in northern San Diego County. Over the course of their junior year other students verbally abused them unrelentingly with antigay slurs and Joey was physically assaulted and his car vandalized. Both eventually dropped out of Poway High School and completed studies toward their high school diplomas at home.

“I was physically attacked and even had threats on my life,” said Ramelli.”  “I begged school officials for help, but they just didn’t care.  No student anywhere should have to go through what I did.  For me, my whole experience at Poway was just three years of my life I’d love to forget.”

Staff Attorney Brian Chase, based in Lambda Legal’s Western Regional Office in Los Angeles, is the organization’s lead attorney on the case. Lambda Legal’s Deputy Legal Director Hayley Gorenberg and co-counsel Paula S. Rosenstein and Bridget J. Wilson of the law firm Rosenstein, Wilson & Dean, P. L. C. in San Diego, join him on the case.

The case is Donovan and Ramelli v. Poway Unified School District.

McCain speaks of gay issues in Blade interview

From Log Cabin Republicans:

John McCain Talks about Gay Issues with LGBT Publication
In a historic first for a Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain submitted answers to questions by the Washington Blade, a leading LGBT publication. In the interview, McCain leaves the door open to signing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act as president, says he supports a review of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, and calls for the development of a National AIDS Strategy.

Read the entire interview.

Conn. high court rules same-sex couples can marry

Associated Press

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Connecticut's Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have the right to marry, making that state the third behind Massachusetts and California to legalize such unions.

The court ruled 4-3 that gay and lesbian couples cannot be denied the freedom to marry under the state constitution, and Connecticut's civil unions law does not provide those couples with the same rights as heterosexual couples.

Justices overturned a lower court ruling and found in favor of the plaintiffs, who said the state's marriage law discriminates against them because it applies only to heterosexual couples, therefore denying gay couples the financial, social and emotional benefits of marriage.

Eight same-sex couples sued in 2004, saying their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process were violated when they were denied marriage licenses.

Averting crisis: Growing up gay in America

BY STEVE ROTHAUS, srothaus@MiamiHerald.com

GoldDecades before Mitchell Gold became a famous furniture mogul, he considered ways to kill himself.

''I debated how to do it. An overdose of sleeping pills seemed somewhat painless,'' Gold writes in his new book, Crisis: 40 Stories Revealing the Personal, Social, and Religious Pain and Trauma of Growing Up Gay in America. ``I considered other tactics -- driving a car off a cliff, running in front of a train, jumping off a building -- but I knew I didn't have the guts.''

Gold, 57 and chairman of furniture company Mitchell Gold + Bob Williams, began to get back his self-esteem during college, with the help of a psychiatrist and support from his parents.

''We really didn't know much until he started growing up,'' said Gold's father Jack, 87, of Pompano Beach. ``He kept it all to himself.''

Mitchell Gold came from a middle-class, Reform Jewish household in Trenton, N.J. He didn't hear anything blatantly antigay at home or in synagogue.

But his parents occasionally joked about fagelas (Yiddish for ''queers'') and he recalls hearing adults at the local country club dismiss homosexuals as ``mentally unstable.''

''When you grew up hearing those things it wasn't very comforting for a kid who was discovering his sexual orientation,'' Gold said.

In 1989, Gold and his then-life partner Bob Williams co-founded their North Carolina furniture business with a $60,000 investment. Sales now exceed $100 million and the company has about 20 showrooms, including one that opened this year in Miami's Design District.

In 2005, Gold began Faith in America, a nonprofit aimed at ``the way religion is being used against gay people today.''

'It got to the point where I said, `This is really crazy. Somebody's got to speak up about it,' '' Williams said. ``The [gay] advocacy organizations did not get to the root of the problem. If you look at the people who are anti-gay, they are using their religious beliefs to justify it.''

gold

Above, Mitchell Gold and his father, Jack, in the Mitchell Gold + Bob Williams showroom in Miami. Photo by Marice Cohn Band, Miami Herald Staff

BY THE BOOK

Gold, last year named to Out magazine's Top 50 Most Powerful Gay People in America list, convinced 40 of America's best-known gay activists and celebrities to write chapters for Crisis ($24, Greenleaf Book Group Press).

''It's not a book of beautiful coming-out stories,'' said Gold, who will donate Crisis profits to seven gay-youth advocacy groups. ``It is a book about people when they discover their same-sex orientations and the immediate crisis they feel in their lives and the years that follow.''

Among the authors of the first-person stories: The Rev. Gene Robinson, an Episcopal bishop from New Hampshire; ex-New Jersey Gov. James McGreevey; Candace Gingrich, younger sister of Newt; U.S. Reps. Barney Frank and Tammy Baldwin; and former pro baseball player Billy Bean of Miami Beach. Tennis star Martina Navratilova wrote the introduction.

One chapter has particular meaning to Gold. It is written by actor Richard Chamberlain -- Gold's first boyhood crush.

''I was like 11 or 12. I was starting to realize that when I saw Dr. Kildare, that was very exciting to me,'' Gold said about watching Chamberlain as the handsome TV doctor in the early 1960s. 'I wanted to be his friend. Then, I really wanted to be his friend. At one point I began to realize, `Why aren't I looking at the nurses on the show the same way?' ''

FROM THE PULPIT

a00_monroe_mdv_ho Some of the book's contributors are gay ministers and preachers.

''What's very poignant in the book is raising the sin question. That's very, very excellent. We have to hit on that issue,'' said The Rev. Irene Monroe of Cambridge, Mass. ``[Crisis] definitely needs to be in the classrooms, on the college campuses. It needs to be [taught] in high schools under social studies.''

She calls the book ''reader friendly.'' ''You're not reading the boring stuff,'' Monroe said. ``It's human stories coming alive.''

Monroe, in her late 40s, grew up in ''the traditional black church'' and graduated from Harvard's divinity school. A lesbian, she spends much of her time speaking about gay issues. Her story heads the first chapter in Crisis, in the section, ``Religious Discrimination: Could You Live With Being Called An Abomination?''

Crisis ''gives a much more comprehensive look at how pervasive homophobia is,'' Monroe said. ``In the media, we hear the religious diatribe. But it's the bully in school, it's the homophobic relative, it's that co-worker. . . . It's not always what they say, but the look they give you.''

Matt_Hill_Comer_3-2008_(6) Matt Comer, 22, grew up attending a strict Baptist church in Winston-Salem, N.C.

''About 10 or 11 years old,'' Comer said, 'I made the connection that the words my preacher used were about me: `Put all the queers in a ship, pluck a hole in the side and send it out to sea.' ''

Comer said he was ``scared to death to even let anybody know what I was feeling.''

''I became very extreme in my religious teachings,'' he said. ``In middle school, I was carrying a Bible to school every day. I condemned my science teacher for teaching evolution. That's what I was taught. It was nothing but a wall, a defensive mechanism. I didn't want anyone to know what I was feeling. If I was the perfect Baptist preacher boy, no one would find out.''

At age 14, he couldn't keep his secret anymore and told everyone he is gay.

``When I did come out, the door kind of flew right open. I was very loud and proud. There was nothing subtle about it.''

Comer said he got no guidance from his church or family. ``I had the benefit of some very understanding teachers. If it had not been for those teachers, life for the rest of the eighth grade would have been hell. It was already hell. It would have been worse.''

In high school, Comer started a gay-straight alliance, which grew to about 40 members by the time he graduated. Today, he is editor of Q-Notes, the gay newspaper in Charlotte, N.C.

Comer still believes deeply in Christianity. ``When you know everyone else will turn their back on you, or have turned their back on you, the only person you have left is Jesus and God. They'll always be there for you.''

Mitchell Gold portrait by Sally Fanjoy + James Labrenz

McDonalds ends gay chamber support, group ends boycott

The American Family Association has ended its boycott of McDonalds, over the hamburger company's membership in the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. From the AFA website:

McDonald's has told AFA they will remain neutral in the culture war regarding homosexual marriage. AFA is ending the boycott of McDonald's. As you know, AFA called for the boycott in May after McDonald's joined the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC).

McDonald's said McDonald's Vice President Richard Ellis has resigned his position on the board of NGLCC and that his seat on the board will not be replaced. McDonald's also said that the company has no plans to renew their membership in NGLCC when it expires in December.

In an e-mail to McDonald's franchised owners the company said, "It is our policy to not be involved in political and social issues. McDonald's remains neutral on same sex marriage or any 'homosexual agenda' as defined by the American Family Association."

We appreciate the decision by McDonald's to no longer support political activity by homosexual activist organizations. You might want to thank your local McDonald's manager.

Arkansas to drop unmarried foster parent ban

By ANDREW DeMILLO, Associated Press

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Arkansas plans to reverse course and allow unmarried or same-sex couples to take on foster children on a case-by-case basis, even as voters prepare to decide the issue in November, the state Department of Human Services said Thursday.

The agency said it would end its plan to formalize the prohibition, which has been in place since an executive directive was signed in 2005. The department said it will instead propose allowing state workers to place foster children case by case.

"Recognizing that this is a sensitive societal issue, it's important to expand our recruitment base so that we can to find a family that best meets the needs of every child," agency director John Selig said.

The change comes as a conservative group campaigns in favor of a November ballot initiative that would ban unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children. The Arkansas Family Council says its measure specifically targets gay couples, though it would affect heterosexual couples, too.

Several children's advocacy groups last week asked the state to drop the policy because it was restricting the number of good homes available for foster children.

Gov. Mike Beebe, who has previously supported the prohibition, last week backed off that support and said a change might be needed because of a shortage of foster homes in the state. Beebe spokesman Matt DeCample said that the governor supports the proposed change and that he changed his mind primarily because of a lack of foster care.

"Pre-empting people right from the start is not going to help address that problem," DeCample said.

A county judge earlier decided that a 1999 state ban on gay and lesbian foster parents was unconstitutional. To get around the ruling, the state broadened the ban to include all unmarried cohabitating couples, not just same-sex couples. The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the county ruling in 2006.

The Arkansas Family Council has said its ballot question is aimed at banning gay and lesbian couples from becoming foster or adoptive parents, though it would affect both gay and straight couples.

Jerry Cox, the council's president, said the agency's decision disappointed him.

"I think it's unfortunate for the children of Arkansas that DHS wilted in the face of a few vocal individuals in Little Rock who didn't like their longstanding policy," Cox said.

Palm Beach Atlantic won't ban gay group

BY KIMBERLY MILLER, Palm Beach Post

Palm Beach Atlantic University officials reconsidered their initial ban of a gay students' rights group from campus, offering members a space for a few hours on Monday to meet with select students and staff from the private Christian school.

But the group, called Soulforce, called the invitation too restrictive and said members planned to walk onto PBAU's downtown West Palm Beach campus at noon, hoping to conduct a more open forum.

''Unfortunately, the format is not conducive to reaching out to the Palm Beach Atlantic community in the spirit of open dialogue,'' a statement released by Soulforce on Wednesday said in reference to PBAU's offer.

``Additionally, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students who need to hear our message of love and affirmation would not be reached in this format.''

Soulforce members are touring the South, visiting 15 mostly Christian colleges to discuss their belief that being gay is not a sin or incompatible with Christianity.

Most of the schools targeted by Soulforce, including PBAU, have policies against same-sex relationships, which school officials consider immoral and contradictory to biblical standards.

This is Soulforce's third annual ''Equality Ride,'' although Monday will be its first visit to a Florida school. This year's ''ride'' includes 17 young adults who travel in a tour bus and have been trained in nonviolent resistance and how to speak with students who have different religious beliefs.

Soulforce members are known for challenging school administrators with attempts to go onto private campuses, and past tours have resulted in trespassing arrests.

Initially, PBAU rejected Soulforce's request to visit, saying that after careful consideration the meeting would not ``meaningfully further the mission of either organization.''

PBAU spokeswoman Becky Peeling said a panel of faculty and staff members made that decision. Administrators later offered a compromise.

''After the Soulforce riders had persisted in their desire to visit our school, our leaders prayerfully felt that they should extend the courtesy of a private meeting,'' Peeling said. ``Our hope was that they would accept our offer, so that previously planned campus activities would not be disrupted.''

Soulforce's first stop this year was an Oct. 1 visit to Liberty University in Virginia. In 2006, several Soulforce members were arrested at Liberty, and the evangelical school initially banned Soulforce from campus again this year.

Liberty later agreed to allow five representatives on campus to talk to students.

On Monday, Soulforce stopped at Columbia International University in Columbia, S.C., where members were allowed to speak with students in a cordoned-off area near campus.

Soulforce is scheduled to arrive in West Palm Beach at 10 a.m. Monday.

Florida gay-marriage ban draws wide support in poll

BY MARC CAPUTO AND JENNIFER MOONEY PIEDRA, mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com

TALLAHASSEE -- Florida voters look close to passing a gay-marriage ban and rejecting a community college tax, and are largely undecided about a handful of property-tax issues, according to a new statewide poll on the state's proposed constitutional amendments.

Regardless of the topic, there's a common theme in voters' preferences: Simplicity, said Brad Coker, pollster for Mason-Dixon Polling & Research. Voters have clear opinions about those amendments that are relatively easy to understand or that have simple titles or buzzwords.

So the ''Florida Marriage Protection Amendment'' garners wide support -- 55 percent for it; 34 percent opposed. And the amendment that would allow local communities to raise the sales tax to help pay for community college is losing by a 37 to 40 percent margin.

'In Florida, `tax' is no longer a three-letter word,'' said Coker. ``It's a four-letter word.''

Yet the poll shows that the electorate doesn't seem to have a strong preference for the amendments that would actually give homeowners or businesses a potential property-tax cut. And that's because of the complexity of the amendments, Coker said.

Consider:

• The amendment to prohibit tax assessment increases for someone who adds hurricane shutters or solar panels is leading by a 29-to-26 percent margin. Undecided: 45 percent.

• The amendment to give a tax break to those who agree to set aside conservation lands is leading 37 to 19 percent. Undecided: 44 percent.

• The amendment to help shield marina owners from big tax-assessment increases leads 33 to 20 percent. Undecided: 47 percent.

However, because it takes a 60 percent vote to approve a constitutional amendment, the property-tax plans could pass if the undecided voters don't cast a ballot on those issues and if support continues to grow and outpaces opposition by a ratio of 3 to 2.

Coker, though, said he expected undecided voters will likely cast a ballot in favor of the gay-marriage amendment, thereby supplying it with the additional 5 percentage points it needs to pass.

''The undecideds always seem to break more strongly toward sort of the more anti-gay side of the issue,'' Coker said.

But not if Florida Red & Blue can help it. The bipartisan group plans to run an ad painting the amendment as ''vague'' and a threat to domestic-partner benefits, even for heterosexual seniors. Supporters of Amendment 2 say that's a scare tactic.

Some members of the legal community also are joining forces against Amendment 2. More than 150 lawyers from across the state signed a letter against the statewide ballot measure that would ban gay marriage by specifying that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. The letter was released Wednesday by Florida Red & Blue.

The attorneys are encouraging voters on Nov. 4 to say ''no'' to the proposal, which opponents say will have consequences for all unmarried couples in Florida, gay and straight.

The critics say say the measure could lead to the potential loss of existing legal protection and benefits, including alimony, estate planning and domestic partnership registries.

Among the lawyers who signed the letter: former Florida House speakers Peter Wallace and Richard Pettigrew, and Talbot ''Sandy'' D'Alemberte, former president of the American Bar Association and former president of Florida State University.

Supporters of Amendment 2 say the opposition is running a campaign based on ''deception,'' trying to convince people that domestic partnerships will be invalidated if the measure passes.

''If they tried to discuss the merits of whether gay marriage is in the best interest of children and family and the common good, they'll lose. And they know that,'' said John Stemberger, president and general counsel of the Florida Family Policy Council, which is promoting the Yes On 2 campaign. ``They're having to refocus the debate on some other scare tactic, like telling people they are going to lose their benefits.''

Stemberger said he is encouraged by the recent poll, but that his group must continue to campaign against well-funded opponents.

Gov. Charlie Crist said he supports defining marriage ``between one man and one woman.''

Yet Crist said he's staying out of all the amendment fights because ``I've got my hands pretty full as it is.''

Gainesville city attorneys: Marriage amendment would weaken nondiscrimination law

News release from Equality Gainesville:

Gainesville City Attorneys Warn of Far-reaching Effects of a Proposed Charter Amendment that would Weaken City's Inclusive Non-Discrimination Ordinance

Gainesville, FL: On Thursday, the Gainesville City Commission heard from city attorneys about the constitutionality and legal ramifications of a proposed city charter amendment in Gainesville that would repeal protections in housing, employment, credit, and public accommodation based on sexual orientation and gender identity, two categories not in the specific Florida Civil Rights statutes the proposed charter amendment cites.

The city attorneys indicated it is also possible the proposed charter amendment would prohibit Gainesville from enforcing protections for classes cited in other Florida statutes, such as veteran preference, familial status, and union membership, which would put Gainesville in violation of Florida law. A political action committee, Equality is Gainesville's Business, has launched a campaign in support of Gainesville's current and future civil rights protections.

In January of this year, Gainesville, home of the University of Florida, joined more than 100 cities and counties and 13 states and the District of Columbia to include gender identity as an additional class against whom discrimination is prohibited. Since 1998, Gainesville has included sexual orientation as a protected category from discrimination in housing, employment, credit, and public accommodation since 1998.

Equality is Gainesville's Business formed in June 2008 when the anti-gay political action committee called Citizens for Good Public Policy (CGPP) began a petition drive to change the Gainesville charter to prevent the City from adding or enforcing any civil rights protections not in specific statutes of the Florida Civil Rights Act.

Also at the October 2 meeting, the Gainesville (Florida) city Commission took the initial step mandated by the city charter to place the proposed amendment on the March 24 city election ballot. In August, the City's Supervisor of Elections certified that 6,343 of the signatures CGPP collected were valid, surpassing the 5,581 required.

Campaign and community leaders have held rallies at Gainesville's City Hall to discuss the actual implications of a proposed ballot initiative that would repeal discrimination protections in housing, employment, credit, and public accommodation for all LGBT people. Campaign spokesperson Terry Fleming explains the group's goal is to "stand united in opposition to the proposed charter amendment."

Nadine Smith, Equality Florida's Executive Director, is also a strong supporter of the current ordinance, and agrees that "Hardworking, high-performing employees shouldn't be fired just because they're gay or transgender. Since 1998, the City of Gainesville has protected gay and lesbians from being unfairly fired or evicted, something that Florida State law does not cover."

Gainesville City Commissioner and campaign chairperson Craig Lowe explained that "Gainesville has carefully cultivated an inclusive environment where every person can contribute and enjoy all we have to offer as a community. This charter amendment would undo all of that."

Mara Keisling, the Executive Director of the National Center for Transgender Equality in Washington D.C. is working with a coalition of national and local leaders to educate voters about this ballot measure and explains "Unfortunately, our opponents want to use misinformation and fear-based tactics to remove protections that have been shown to benefit Gainesville's residents. Preserving the American ethic of fair treatment for hard work is important and so are the rights of residents to provide housing and income for their families."

Lowe also noted that "Gainesville should not surrender its home rule authority to fight discrimination."

UM, Florida Bar to present 'Out in Court: Thirty Years of Gays and Lesbians in the Legal Profession'

From the Florida Bar website:

The Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education Committee and the Equal Opportunities Law Section present Out in Court: Thirty Years of Gays and Lesbians in the Legal Profession

Course Classification:Intermediate Level

One Location: October 17, 2008
University of Miami School of Law * Room 352 * 1311 Miller Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146
305-284-2392

Course No. 0806R

Seminar topics include Practicing Homosexual while Practicing Law; Thirty years after Board of Florida Bar Examiners re Eimers; Coming Out Professionally: Before I Forget to Tell You, I’m Gay; Reprising Immorality and Public Decency in the 1970s: Eimers, Hawkins, and Moffett.

12:00 noon - 12:30 p.m., Late Registration

12:30 p.m. - 12:40 p.m., Welcome and Introductions
Matthew W. Dietz, Miami - Chair, Equal Opportunities Law Section

1:00 p.m. -1:30 p.m., Opening Remarks
Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Rep. Fla. 20th Cong. Dist. Vice-Chair, House LGBT Equality Caucus

1:30 p.m. - 2:15 p.m., Practicing Homosexual, Practicing Law: A Proud March Since In Re Eimers
Hon. Rand Hoch, West Palm Beach, Law and Mediation Offices of Rand Hoch, P.A.,

2:15 p.m. - 3:00 p.m., In re Board of Florida Bar Examiners re Eimers – Thirty Years Later
Professor Bruce Winick, University of Miami, Miami

3:00 p.m. - 3:45 p.m., Coming Out Professionally: Before I Forget to Tell You, I’m Gay
Rosemary Wilder, Miami, Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis

3:45 p.m. – 4:15 p.m., Reprising Immorality and Public Decency in the 1970s: Eimers, Hawkins, and Moffett
Former Chief Justice Arthur England, Miami, Greenberg Traurig

4:15 p.m. - 4:30 p.m., Closing Remarks
Larry D. Smith, Orlando, Cabaniss Smith Toole & Wiggins, PL

4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m., Reception (all are welcome)

Arrive early to avoid parking congestion.

Judge David Young and Cynthia Nixon campaign for Obama

Sony Pictures Television today sent me this publicity photo of Miami's TV Judge David Young with Sex and the City co-star Cynthia Nixon, taken last week while Nixon was in South Florida campaigning for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

JDY-Cynthia Nixon-Obama Event

GLSEN: Nearly 9 of 10 LGBT students experience harassment

GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, today released the most comprehensive report ever on the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students, The 2007 National School Climate Survey. The report is being released in conjunction with the announcement that GLSEN will partner with the Ad Council on a multiyear national public education campaign targeting anti-LGBT language among teenagers.

The survey of 6,209 middle and high school students found that nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT students (86.2%) experienced harassment at school in the past year, three-fifths (60.8%) felt unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation and about a third (32.7%) skipped a day of school in the past month because of feeling unsafe.

“The 2007 National School Climate Survey reveals that, on a whole, the situation is still dire for many LGBT youth when it comes to school safety,” GLSEN Executive Director Kevin Jennings said. “It’s hard to believe that anyone who reads this report could continue to turn the other way as our nation’s LGBT students are bullied and harassed at alarming rates. The good news is there’s hope. The 2007 National School Climate Survey also shows that when schools and educators take action, they can make a drastic difference.”

Download the full report at http://www.glsen.org/binary-ata/GLSEN_ATTACHMENTS/file/000/001/1290-1.pdf

Key Findings of The 2007 National School Climate Survey include:

A Hostile School Climate and the Effects on Academic Achievement:

•    86.2% of LGBT students reported being verbally harassed, 44.1% reported being physically harassed and 22.1% reported being physically assaulted at school in the past year because of their sexual orientation.

•    73.6% heard derogatory remarks such as “faggot” or “dyke” frequently or often at school.

•    More than half (60.8%) of students reported that they felt unsafe in school because of their sexual orientation, and more than a third (38.4%) felt unsafe because of their gender expression.

•    31.7% of LGBT students missed a class and 32.7% missed a day of school in the past month because of feeling unsafe, compared to only 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively, of a national sample of secondary school students.

•    The reported grade point average of students who were more frequently harassed because of their sexual orientation or gender expression was almost half a grade lower than for students who were less often harassed (2.8 versus 2.4).

Positive Interventions and Support:

•    Students in schools with a Gay-Straight Alliance reported hearing fewer homophobic remarks, experienced less harassment and assault because of their sexual orientation and gender expression, were more likely to report incidents of harassment and assault to school staff, were less likely to feel unsafe because of their sexual orientation or gender expression, were less likely to miss school because of safety concerns and reported a greater sense of belonging to their school community.

•    The presence of supportive staff contributed to a range of positive indicators including fewer reports of missing school, greater academic achievement, higher educational aspirations and a greater sense of belonging to their school community.

•    Students from a school with a safe school policy that included protections based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity/expression heard fewer homophobic remarks, experienced lower levels of victimization related to their sexual orientation, were more likely to report that staff intervened when hearing homophobic remarks and were more likely to report incidents of harassment and assault to school staff.

Despite the positive benefits of these interventions, only about a third of students (36.3%) reported having a Gay-Straight Alliance at school. The same number of students (36.3%) could identify six or more supportive educators and only a fifth (18.7%) attended a school that had a comprehensive safe school policy.

The percentage of states with comprehensive safe school laws is also low. Only 11 states and the District of Columbia protect students from bullying and harassment based on sexual orientation, and only seven states and DC protect students on the basis of gender identity/expression. The report found that having a generic law that did not include specific categories was essentially as effective for LGBT students as having no law at all.

“Since the first National School Climate Survey in 1999, we have seen little improvement in the overall school climate for LGBT students which is disturbing in that improving school climate facilitates student safety and relates to positive educational outcomes,” GLSEN Research Director Dr. Joseph Kosciw said. “Although the results of this report illustrate the grim experience in school for many LGBT students, it also highlights the important role that educators and institutional supports can play in remedying the situation.”

GLSEN's biennial National School Climate Survey is the only national survey to document the experiences of students who identify as LGBT in America's secondary schools. The 2007 survey includes responses from 6,209 LGBT students between the ages of 13 and 21 from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data collection was conducted through community-based groups, online outreach, and targeted advertising on the social networking site MySpace.

The survey is being released simultaneously with the announcement of GLSEN’s partnership with the Ad Council. The Ad Council, known for public education campaigns such as “Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires,” “Loose Lips Sink Ships,” “A Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste” and “Take a Bite Out of Crime,” is producing its first-ever LGBT-themed campaign, featuring TV public service announcements starring Hilary Duff and Wanda Sykes. The spots will debut later this month.

About GLSEN

GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, is the leading national education organization focused on ensuring safe schools for all students. Established nationally in 1995, GLSEN envisions a world in which every child learns to respect and accept all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression. For more information on our educator resources, research, public policy agenda, student organizing programs or development initiatives, visit www.glsen.org.

Queen Latifah: I don't care if you think I'm gay

From Fox News:

Queen Latifah says she doesn't care if people think she's gay.

"I don't have a problem discussing the topic of somebody being gay, but I do have a problem discussing my personal life," Latifah, 38, told Sunday's New York Times magazine.

"You don't get that part of me. Sorry," she added. "We're not discussing it in our meetings, we're not discussing it at Cover Girl...nobody gets that.

"I don't feel like I need to share my personal life, and I don't care if people think I'm gay or not," she said. "Assume whatever you want. You do it anyway."

Latifah had been linked to her longtime personal trainer. Last December, she denied rumors that they were getting married.

"People will make up all sorts of things that are not true," she told the Chicago Sun-Times. "There ain't gonna' be no wedding."

Poll: Florida gay-marriage ban likely to pass

BY MARC CAPUTO, mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com

TALLAHASSEE -- Florida voters look close to passing a gay-marriage ban and rejecting a community college tax and are largely undecided about a handful of property-tax issues, according to a new statewide poll concerning the state's proposed constitutional amendments.

Regardless of the topic, there's a common theme in voters' preferences: Simplicity, said Brad Coker, pollster for Mason-Dixon Polling & Research. Voters have clear opinions about those amendments that are relatively easy to understand or that have simple titles or buzzwords.

So the ''Florida Marriage Protection Amendment'' garners wide support -- 55 percent in support; 34 percent opposed. And the amendment that would allow local communities to raise the sales tax to help pay for community college is losing by a 37 to 40 percent margin.

'In Florida, `tax' is no longer a three letter word,'' said Coker. ``It's a four letter word.''

Yet the poll shows that the electorate doesn't seem to have a strong preference for the amendments that would actually give homeowners or businesses a potential property tax cut. And that's because of the complexity of the amendments, Coker said.

Consider:

• The amendment to prohibit tax assessment increases for someone who adds hurricane shutters or solar panels is leading by a 29 to 26 percent margin. Undecided: 45 percent. • The amendment to give a tax break to those who agree to set aside conservation lands is leading by 37 to 19 percent. Undecided: 44 percent.

• The amendment to help shield marina owners from big tax-assessment increases leads 33 to 20 percent. Undecided: 47 percent.

However, because it takes a 60 percent vote to approve a constitutional amendment, the property-tax plans could pass if the undecided voters don't cast a ballot on thoseissues and if support continues to outpace opposition by a ratio of 3 to 2.

Coker, though, said he expected undecided voters will likely cast a ballot in favor of the gay-marriage amendment, thereby supplying it with the additional 5 percentage points it needs to pass.

''The undecideds always seem to break more strongly toward sort of the more anti-gay side of the issue,'' Coker said.

But not if Florida Red & Blue can help it. The group plans to run an ad painting the amendment as ''vague'' and a threat to domestic-partner benefits, even for heterosexual seniors. Supporters of Amendment 2 say that's a scare tactic.

Gov. Charlie Crist said he supports defining marriage ''between one man and one woman.'' Yet Crist said he's staying out of all the amendment fights because ``I've got my hands pretty full as it is.''

Gay Equality Ride to visit Palm Beach Atlantic University

Soulforce news release:

Young Adults Tour Christian Colleges to Advocate Safety and Inclusion for All Students

What: On Monday, October 13, the Soulforce Q Equality Ride, a youth-organized bus tour to faith-based colleges, will bring a message of inclusion and safety to Palm Beach Atlantic University (PBA). The Equality Ride promotes safe educational settings for all students, including those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT).

PBA has stated that the Equality Riders will not be permitted to enter their campus to engage students in peaceful dialogue about faith and fairness. Initially, university officials completely refused to allow Equality Riders on campus stating that the Equality Ride’s visit “would not meaningfully further the mission of either organization”. After the Equality Ride’s visits to Liberty and Columbia International, Palm Beach Atlantic officials contacted Equality Ride leadership about a limited meeting. President David W. Clark’s office explained that Riders would be escorted onto campus for a two hour meeting with a pre-selected group of students and staff in an undisclosed location. Unfortunately, this format is certainly not conducive to reaching out to the Palm Beach Atlantic community in the spirit of open dialogue. Additionally, the LGBT students who need to hear the Ride’s message of love and affirmation would not be reached in this format. Therefore, Soulforce Q Equality Riders will walk on to campus as originally planned at noon in hopes of being welcomed as guests and provided an open forum for meaningful dialogue. Riders will join with members of the Palm Beach community to give a voice to all of the LGBT students who have been silenced at PBA.

Why: More than 200 U.S. colleges and universities have explicit policies that discriminate against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students. At Palm Beach Atlantic the student handbook forbids, “sexual activity that is inconsistent with biblical teaching, such as: … homosexual behavior.” Moreover, the handbook explains that “Since sexual expression is not merely physical, but deeply involves the mind, spirit and emotions, there is a need for sensitivity and caution at every level of intimacy” which further expands the ways in which administration can target LGBT students. Punitive action can be taken against LGBT people at the discretion of the university administration, leading to a climate of fear and uncertainty for gay and transgender students.

When: Monday, October 13th, 2008

10:00 am, Equality Ride arrives

12:00 pm, Equality Riders attempt to walk on to campus

Where: 901 S Flagler Dr, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach, Florida

Who: The 18 to 28-year-old Equality Riders are members of Soulforce Q, the young adult division of Soulforce, a national social justice organization.

Since 2006, the Equality Ride has visited 50 schools, hosting public forums, participating in panel discussions, and taking part in worship services and Bible studies. The goal is to inspire further conversation and to empower students, faculty, and administrators to make their school welcoming to all students.

The organizers of the Equality Ride use a collaborative approach, writing to college administrators months in advance and inviting them to work together to design programming that examines diverse points of view—including points of view that affirm gay and transgender students.

###

Soulforce Q is the young adult division of Soulforce, a social justice organization that works to end political and religious oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people through relentless nonviolent resistance. For more information, go to www.equalityride.org.

154 Florida lawyers warn voters about Amendment 2

News release from Florida Red & Blue’s SayNo2 campaign:

Legal Community Agrees Amendment 2 Could Threaten Existing Rights in Florida

As the old joke goes: “How do you get three answers to one question?  Ask a lawyer.” 

So it’s amazing when 154 lawyers agree on anything.  Yet that’s just the case when it comes to opposition against Amendment 2, the so-called Florida Marriage Protection Amendment.

Today, Florida Red & Blue released a letter signed by 154 Florida lawyers that warns voters about Amendment 2,

Signers include former Florida House Speakers Peter Wallace and Richard Pettigrew and former President of the American Bar Association, Dean of Florida State University College of Law and President of Florida State University, Talbot ("Sandy") D'Alemberte.

Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR), charged with reviewing the economic impact of potential amendments on Floridians, stated three ways existing rights and benefits could be put at risk:

  • "If domestic partnership registries are deemed substantially equivalent to marriage, their termination could place registrants at risk of losing specified rights and benefits, such as those related to health insurance."
  • "Some local governments that currently extend health insurance and other benefits to domestic partners may be impacted."
  • "By invalidating any union or ‘substantial equivalent thereof,' this amendment could be raised as a defense in domestic violence cases, resulting in fewer domestic violence convictions."

Currently three Florida Statutes [741.212 (1), 741.212 (2), 741.212 (3)] prohibit marriages between persons of the same sex while the state's Defense of Marriage Law (codified as s. 741.212) also makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.

###

Fellow Floridians:
We, the undersigned Florida attorneys, sign this letter to publicly share our concerns about the vague language and potentially damaging consequences of the proposed Constitutional Amendment 2 and urge our fellow Floridians to join us in opposing its inclusion in the Florida Constitution. Amendment 2 is called the “Florida Marriage Protection Amendment” and is often referred to by the media as a “gay marriage ban.” The proposed amendment is:

"Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized."


Florida Law Already Prohibits Same-Sex Marriage

References to ‘marriage protection’ or ‘gay marriage bans’ are misleading as four existing Florida statues [FS 741.212 (1), 741.212 (2), 741.212 (3) and 741.04] already define marriage as the union of a man and a woman or otherwise prohibit the creation or recognition of ‘same-sex marriages.’ The legality or recognition of ‘same-sex’ unions in Florida will be no more or less illegal in Florida regardless of the outcome of the proposed amendment.

Ambiguity in Amendment Language Will Likely Result in Unanticipated and Serious Economic and Legal Repercussions

Our chief concern is the section of the proposed amendment which states: “…no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”
We agree with the 2006 report of the Florida Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) which concluded: “The amendment provides no definition for the phrase ‘substantial equivalent thereof,' which lends to the ambiguity of the wording of the proposed amendment.”
Adding such vague, untested and undefined language is likely to deliver unanticipated repercussions and could substantially alter our state both economically and legally. Quoting the EDR report on Amendment 2 again, it warns, "Depending on actions taken by the Legislature, the courts, and Florida businesses, financial obligations between individuals are expected to change in complex ways…”

Potential Loss of Existing Legal Protections and Benefits for All Floridians.

  • Alimony: In 2005, the State Legislature adopted new law designed to prevent a loophole where a former spouse receiving permanent alimony opts to cohabitate with a new partner rather than remarrying and continues to receive permanent alimony. Under this relatively new divorce law, a former spouse’s alimony obligation may terminate if the recipient spouse enters into a “supportive relationship” with another person. Florida case law defines a supportive relationship as one that provides “support equivalent to marriage”. Clearly, “support equivalent to marriage” is dangerously similar to “substantial equivalent to marriage”. The portion of Florida Statute 61.14 recognizing a relationship providing “support equivalent to marriage” could be held unconstitutional under Amendment 2. As a result, every former spouse who is either Court Ordered or who signed an agreement to pay permanent alimony could be required to continue paying alimony despite the fact that the receiving spouse has found a new partner. At the very least, these individuals will face a costly Court battle trying to uphold their agreements and to terminate their alimony obligations.
  • Domestic Violence Protection: Other potential impacts include using Amendment 2 as a defense to domestic violence on an unmarried partner (a similar amendment was used as a domestic violence defense in Ohio). Quoting the EDR again, "By invalidating any union or ‘substantial equivalent thereof,' this amendment could be raised as a defense in domestic violence cases, resulting in fewer domestic violence convictions."
  • Private Property Arrangements and Estate Planning: Without examining every potential consequence in great detail, it is possible that Amendment 2 could also have profound implications on the ability of citizens to share property or pass on assets, establish trusts or other legal arrangements or even remarry. Especially likely to be impacted by this outcome are Florida’s senior citizens and retirees who remain unmarried by choice and share pension benefits or other government benefits they have earned.
  • Domestic Partnership Registries: This vague and broad language could also risk termination of the several established domestic partnership registries which are currently accessible to millions of Floridians. These registries allow unmarried Floridians to share benefits or other protections such as hospital visitation, burial rights and health care benefits. The non-partisan and independent EDR report again sites this concern in finding: “If domestic partnership registries are deemed substantially equivalent to marriage, their termination could place registrants at risk of losing specified rights and benefits, such as those related to health insurance."

While no one can know the full impact of the proposed amendment, litigation will result as vested interests challenge shared health plans, defend domestic abusers or governments seek clarity to the undefined language in the proposal. Even if every warning and potential outcome proves unfounded, the years of uncertainty and sheer legal expenses would be costly and unnecessary. As attorneys, our legal education and experience make us hesitant to support the vague and untested language in Amendment 2. Adding such a provision to our Constitution is unwise, especially when adopting the amendment will not alter our state’s current laws banning ‘same-sex marriage.’
As Floridians, we are concerned by the range of impacts Amendment 2 could have on us and our neighbors. It’s simply not worth risk that Amendment 2 could take away existing legal protections and benefits from even a single Floridian.
Accordingly, we strongly oppose the adoption of Amendment 2 and ask our legal colleagues and all Florida voters to join us in speaking out and voting against this dangerous provision. With regards and thanks for your attention.

Ramon Abadin

Lawrence Abramson

David Ackley

W. Cleveland Acree, II

Angie Angelis

Mary Merrell Bailey

Greg  Baldwin

Patricia Baloyra

Lori Barkus

Jeff Battista

David Jay Bernstein

Margaret Bettenhausen

Garry Bevel

Brian Bilzin

Michael Birnholz

Edward Blaisdell

Jonathan Blecher

Stacy Borisov

Susan Bozorgi

Rutledge Bradford

Mark Brandt

Nancy Brodzki

Kenneth Bryk

Jeffrey Buak

Peggy Smith Bush

O. Kim Byrd

Taysha  Carmody

Jerry Chasen

Edward Conrad-Waggoner

Leslie Cooney

Eric Copeland

Penelope Crandall

Earl  Crittenden

Chad Cronon

Thomas Cushman

Talbot  D'Alemberte

David da Silva Cornell

Patrick Daugherty

Jacqueline Kelley Davis

Shelbi Day

Deirdre Dibiaggio

Roger Dodd

Karen M. Doering

Michael  Dolce

Robert  Dougherty

D. Michael Elkins

Sarah Engel

Michael Feiler

David  Finkelstein, Attorney and CPA

Beth Fountain

Fredrick "Rick" Freedman

Rick Freedman

Ellen Freidin

Jaime Generazzo

Judd Goldberg

Michael Gongora

David Goroff

Mark Grant

Sandra Greenblatt

Ron Gunzburger

Robert Hasty

William  Hill

Donald Hinkle

Mary Hoftiezer

Patrick Howell

Yosbel Ibarra

Harry Jacobs

Russell Jacobs

Kathryn  Kasprzak

Ken Keechl

Kristyne  Kennedy

Georg Ketelhohn

Robert Kohlman

Judith Koons

Joel Kopelman

Jeremy Korch

John Kozyak

Benedict P. Kuehne

Edward Lack

Stephan Lampasso

Shawn Libman

Peter Lichtman

Joanne Linley

Lisa London

John Lord, Jr.

Sheryl Lowenthal

Wallace Magathan

Chris  Mancini

Shana  Manuel

David Marko

Lee Marks

Yery Marrero

Michele Martin

Natalie Maxwell

Liz McCausland

Blaine McChesney

Nicole  McLaren

Carrington Mead

Mary Meeks

Jeffrey  Miller

Richard  Milstein

Sa Mollica

Regine Monestime

Michael Morris

Gregg Morton

Anthony Niedwiecki

Anne O'Berry

Lynn Overmann

Patsy Palmer

Marshall Pasternack

Andrew Patten

Richard Pettigrew

Laura Pichardo

Lorene L. Clemans Powell

Sam  Rabin

Brett Rahall

Oliver Ramos

Patricia Rathburn

Mycki Ratzan

Gary Resnick

Philip Richardson

Miriam Richter

Joel Robrish

Robert Rossano

John Ruffier

John Ruffier

Mauro Santos

David  Schauer

Scott Schlegel

Warren S.  Schwartz

Mark Scott

Joseph Seagle

Larry Smith

Scott Sokol

Neal Sonnett

Kelly Spegon

Robert Spohrer

Helen Spohrer

Carey Stiss

Kimarie Stratos

John  Sumberg

Matthew Tabakman

Jeremy Thompson

Jonas Urba

Matthew Walker

Philip Wallace

Peter Wallace

Roberta Watson

James Weinkle

Patricia Welles

Crystal Whitescarver

Mitchell Widom

Marva Wiley

Camille Worsnop