The blue heart of a glacier

About 10 years ago, on a summer vacation in Chamonix, at the base of Mont Blanc, I did the tourist thing and took the little mountain train to Montenvers and from there descended into the heart of the Mer de Glace, the Sea of Ice glacier.

Every summer, a grotto featuring an enormous bedroom, dining room and more, is carved out of the ice where the temperature remains just below freezing. Although it was certainly an interesting side trip,  what has really stayed with me is the color of the ice: the purest, most luscious turquoise you could imagine. Its intensity was so mesmerizing it's as if I wanted it to absorb me. As the climate warms, adventures like this may be hard to experience.

Sometimes, on nature programs that feature calving icebergs, you get a glimpse of it.

Yes, this all very far from Florida's environment (at least until the sea level rises) but I came across some gorgeous photos of rare, striped icebergs in Antartica on The Daily Telegraph's website. Check them out and you'll get an idea of what I saw in the heart of a sea of ice.

Plastic bags, again

Before moving to the U.S. in '86, I shopped at Sainsbury's, one of the U.K.'s leading supermarket chains. When it introduced plastic bags, it charged for them. It seemed outrageous at the time, but not so now. If banning doesn't work, how about making us pay for them?

See why plastic bags are so dangerous to the environment here.

How important is our environment?

A couple of weeks ago, fellow blogger Brenda received an email from an unhappy chap in N. Broward and she forwarded it to the rest of us. Suffice to say that this reader considered environmentalists to be marginally better than fundamentalist Islamic terrorists. Unfortunately, I deleted the email because I would have liked to have asked him to participate in the following thought experiment:

Imagine that you are the last human being on the planet, and in 24 hours you too will no longer exist. How and where would you choose to spend those final hours?

I encourage everyone to think about it and post a response. Let's see what really matters.

Important climate bill fails as parties bicker

Such a shame:

Senate climate bill blocked

By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer

Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a global warming bill that would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases, pushing debate over the world's biggest environmental concern to next year for a new Congress and president.

Democratic leaders fell a dozen votes short of getting the 60 needed to end a Republican filibuster on the measure and bring the bill up for a vote, prompting Majority Leader Harry Reid to pull the legislation from consideration.

The Senate debate focused on bitter disagreement over the expected economic costs of putting a price on carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas that comes from burning fossil fuels. Opponents said it would lead to higher energy costs.

The 48-36 vote fell short of a majority, but Democrats produced letters from six senators — including both presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain — saying they would have voted for the measure had they been there.

"It's just the beginning for us," proclaimed Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., a chief sponsor of the bill, noting that 54 senators had expressed support of the legislation, although that's still short of what would be needed to overcome concerted GOP opposition.

"It's clear a majority of Congress wants to act," Boxer said at a news conference.

She and other Democrats said this now lays the groundwork for action on climate change next year with a new Congress and a new president that will be more hospitable to mandatory greenhouse gas reductions.

Both Obama and McCain have called for capping carbon dioxide and other emissions linked to climate change. President Bush has opposed such measures and said he would have vetoed the Senate bill if he had received it.

The bill would have capped carbon dioxide coming from power plants, refineries and factories, with a target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 71 percent by mid-century.

"It's a huge tax increase," argued Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a prominent coal-producing state. He maintained that the proposed system of allowing widespread trading of carbon emissions allowances would produce "the largest restructuring of the American economy since the New Deal."

Supporters of the bill accused Republicans of muddying the water with misinformation.

"There is no tax increase," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., one of the bill's chief sponsors said. She said the emissions trading system would provide tax relief to help people pay energy prices. And supporters disputed that it would substantially increase gasoline prices.

Four Democrats joined most Republicans in essentially killing the bill.

Obama and McCain, as well as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who is recovering from cancer surgery, were absent, although they each sent a letter supporting the bill.

 
About MiamiHerald.com | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | Copyright | About the McClatchy Company