« We're sticking with Hillary | Main | Crist health math: fewer rules = more insurance »

Clinton camp makes case for superdelegates

Hillary Clinton's campaign suggested Saturday that even if Barack Obama earns more delegates in state primaries and caucuses than she does, a circle of politicians and party insiders should crown her the nominee because she would make a better candidate in November.

Neither Democrat is in reach of the 2,025 delegates needed to cinch the nomination, but Obama is ahead by about 140 pledged delegates. Even the Clinton campaign acknowledges it expects him to retain the lead after several more contests.

But top Clinton advisor Harold Ickes called that a "minuscule'' edge and said it should not sway the so-called superdelegates -- 796 members of Congress and the Democratic National Committee who can vote for whomever they please at the nominating convention. Ickes said he prefers to call them "automatic delegates.''

"Automatic delegates are supposed to make their best judgment about who would be a good and hopefully a great president, and more importantly, who would win in November,'' he told reporters in a telephone call, pointing to Clinton's wider appeal among Hispanic voters and her victories in some swing states. Independent voters and traditionally Republican states who have favored Obama, he said, can't be counted on in November.

The full story is here.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The implication of Ickes remarks is that Democratic voters who have supported Hillary Clinton can't be counted on in November if Obama is the nominee. This is nonsense spin. Of course most every Democrat will come out to repudiate 8 years of Bush regardless of nominee. And of course it is very difficult to win a national election without a healthy dollop of independents. Hillary and Co. should spend more time thinking about how to broaden her actual appeal with voters instead calling a 5%+ margin "minuscule" and finding ways of rationalizing a political analysis that asserts -- with a straight face -- that the more polarizing candidate is automatically better positioned for a general election despite all the dynamics of the race thus far. Political judo only gets you so far.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

 

About MiamiHerald.com | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | Copyright | About the McClatchy Company