« 1st DCA rejects Save Our Homes challenge: Black Flag dead | Main | Several boxes related to Epstein case seized in Rothstein raid »

Brown-Waite: Now where exactly is Florida's 86th congressional district?

The White House's reporting on stimulus spending is under attack -- with its website -- Recovery.Gov -- citing spending in congressional districts that don't exist.

Brooksville Republican Ginny Brown-Waite says she checked the website to see that "Democrats have spent $3,582,587 to create 5 jobs in Florida’s 86th congressional district. In the fighting 53rd they spent $460,000 of your taxpayer dollars to create zero jobs." (Florida, Brown-Waite notes for the record, has just 25 congressional districts.)

"The truthiness of the President’s claims is mind boggling," she says. "How can we expect the administration to run stimulus when they can’t even run a website?"

The White House told ABC News -- which initially reported the phenom -- that the mistakes in crediting nonexistent congressional districts were caused by human error.

"We report what the recipients submit to us," said Ed Pound, communications director for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board. Pound said the board receives declarations from the recipients - state governments, federal agencies and universities - of stimulus money about what program is being funded.

"Some recipients clearly don't know what congressional district they live in, so they appear to be just throwing in any number."

Not every GOP'er is fuming at numbers for fake districts: Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart said the website shows that 180 jobs have been "saved or created" in his district, "after an infusion of over $140,000,000. This brings the total cost per job 'saved or created' to more than $800,000 of taxpayer funds."

"I am appalled at the dismal failure of the so-called ‘stimulus’ bill," Diaz-Balart said. "The legislation has created very few jobs, and the American people are left footing the bill for this wasteful and ill-conceived spending program."

Republicans aren't the only ones steamed about the mistakes. House Appropriations chair David Obey, D-Wisconsin, fired off an angry e-mail, calling the inaccuracies "outrageous" and saying the administration "owes itself, the Congress, and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes.

 "Credibility counts in government and stupid mistakes like this undermine it," Obey said. "We’ve got too many serious problems in this country to let that happen. 

"We designed the Recovery Act to be open and transparent and I expect the the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, who oversees the recovery act web site and data to have information that is accurate, reliable and understandable to the American public. Whether the numbers are good news or bad news, I want the honest numbers and I want them now."

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

alice

And this is the so called stimulus package that Crist and his buddy Obama loved? RUN MARCO RUN WE NEED YOU NOW MORE THAN EVER.

whasup

Well this Accountability and Transparency Board certainly is both. It's so into accountability, that it just keeps counting higher and higher, even beyond congressional district numbers that actually exist. It's so into transparency that the taxpayers can see right through it, without our vision being blocked in the least by real facts.

Steve

I want...
I expect...
I demand...

This all sounds like the ramblings of some Neo-Con gesturing for position. Explanation asked and answered, but of course clerical errors on a multi-million user project are akin to a failing administration.

Stop grasping at straws, it only serves to make you look like a tool, moreso

John

"Explanation asked and answered" - Accountability Steve. Do you accept every explanation given to you blindly without question? They should have done their homework like a razor. This bill is important to the whitehouse and many democrats. These errors could cost them votes.

In my opinion, they were caught with pants down fiddling with the data. Of course, if I believe otherwise, I'm just a neo-con who should accept any explanation without question.

The comments to this entry are closed.