Note: This blog's templates will be updated this afternoon to a responsive design bringing it in line with

At that time, we will also change to the Facebook commenting system. You will need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment.

« Collective bargaining legislation splits law enforcement | Main | Trial-lawyer roundup in Senate »

Bill McCollum's 'political frolic' continues...

Is it an election year, or what?

First Attorney General Bill McCollum holds a slew of press conferences leading up to his lawsuit aimed at stopping ObamaCare. He and other attorneys general hired an outside lawyer that, they say, will cost each state about $20 an hour. At the same time, McCollum's pushing legislation to cap the fees of outside attorneys.

Enter Sen. Dan Gelber, a Democrat seeking to succeed the Republican attorney general. He sponsored an amendment to the McCollum's fee-cap legislation (first reported here) aimed at stopping the lawsuit. The amendment failed 12-24 on a party-line vote. But not before Gelber pulled out the rhetorical stops.

“Why is our Attorney General spending all the resources of his office almost on a daily basis for this political frolic to get headlines?" Gelber said, grabbing a headline of his own. He called McCollum's effort a "circus" and an "ideological escapade," and said that McCollum is siding with big insurance companies against kids while ignoring child predators, pill mills and gang violence -- all are issues that McCollum, however, has made priorities.

Sen. John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine, gave Gelber a mild there-you-go-again chiding.

"My good friend Sen. Gelber. You're at it again," Thrasher said.

“What we’ve gotten into unfortunately is a political debate over legislation passed in Washington D.C.”
“Defend us from a mandate that has never before in the history of this country has never been done: where we have to purchase insurance.”

After the amendment died, the other Democratic Sen. running for Attorney General, Dave Aronberg, bashed the fee caps as a "polluters protection act." Aronberg said the bill would unfairly "tie the hands of future attorneys general" in big tort cases like an oil spill or a massive prescription drug case.

Thrasher also swiped at Aronberg, thanking him and Gelber for trading blows against his bill.

"It's good to see you all dividing your time," Thrasher said. The bill passed 27-11 and now heads to the governor for his signature.