« AARP tells legislators: quit stalling PSC reform, work it out | Main | David Rivera to raise some DC dollars »

Senators want a counter amendment to 'clarify' the Fair Districts plan

Two years before they begin the process of the once-a-decade redrawing of state political boundaries, the Senate Committee on Reapportionment is prepared to put a counter amendment on the November ballot to "clarify" two amendments  by FairDistricts.org, which threatens to make their job very difficult.

The Fair Districts campaign has already secured Amendments Five and Six on the ballot, which would impose a series of standards for legislators to follow, including the notion that they draw the districts without benefitting any incumbent.

The committee on Monday asked its staff to propose language that would serve as an additional amendment on the November ballot, to "make sure the spirit of the Fair Districts amendment" is met, said Sen. Mike Haridopolos, R-Melbourne, who will be Senate president in 2011. Those goals, he said, "not to lose minority representation and make sure that communities of interest are preserved when tne districts are redrawn.''

This effort to help the Fair Districts effort is not likely to be seen as a maganimous gesture by the organizers of the petition drive that won the ballot placement. The Senate committee is comprised of Republicans like Haridopolos who fear the Fair Districts guidelines will undercut their ability to craft districts to the benefit of Republicans, and African American senators, who worry that the guidelines will reduce minority representation.

"We haven't found a way to apply the standards in a way that would be constitutional,'' said John Gutherie, the Senate committee's staff director.

Not everyone on the committee believes the counter-offensive is needed, since the Fair Districts amendments will need a 60 percent majority to become law.

"Somewhere in the balance, I have a lot of faith and trust in the ballot box and the people of the state of Florida,'' said Sen. Charlie Dean, R-Inverness.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

David Burnham

My question is why do our supposed (Public Officials) politicians always want to go against what the people want? We take the time to get the signatures needed to have an amendment that is acutally good for us and bad for them and they want to find a way around it water it down. The same is true with the budget in Tallassee right now. They want to water down the campaign reforms propostion so they can create a slush fund for them to play with. They are not Royalty! They are public servanst and are supposed to do what is best for their constituants (all of us) not what is best for the selected few that give them large campaign contributions. I for one will be voting against all incombents the November. With the way they draw the lines we really don't have fair representaion in Government. They pick who they want we are supposed to beleive that our vote counts but it really doen't. They just need to draw squares along county lines. We the People of Florida pay for them to draw their own lines as well. This has to STOP!

The comments to this entry are closed.