Two senators suing Gov. Rick Scott over his decision to kill a high speed rail line between Tampa and Orlando argue in court documents filed today that Scott's response to the suit shows he does not plan to abide by the Florida Rail Act approved by the state Legislature in late 2009. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for 3 p.m. on Thursday.
Senators Thad Altman and Arthenia Joyner have asked the Supreme Court to order Scott to accept $2.4 billion in federal funding to build the line, saying Scott overstepped his executive authority when he rejected the money after a previous Legislature and governor had agreed to go forward with hit. Lawmakers also appropriated $131 million in federal stimulus money to get construction started.
Scott argued in court documents filed today that the appropriation merely authorizes spending of the $131 million, but does not require it. He also said it would be irreponsible for the Florida Rail Enterprise to spend the money if no additional funding will be available to complete the project.
According to documents filed by Altman and Joyner, in making that argument, Scott "has admitted that he claims that he can exercise the powers expressly allocated to the Legislature regarding the budget."
Altman and Joyner also argue that the Constitution requires Scott to execute laws passed by the Legislature, and "the Legislature expressly set forth in the Florida Rail Act the public policy of this state regarding high speed rail."
In Scott's legal response to the lawsuit, he has "admitted that he does not intend to comply" with the Florida Rail Act, which was approved by state lawmakers in a December 2009 special session called specifically to discuss rail.












Florida Post Midterm Election Update - Poll At The End
http://www.practicalstate.com/?p=5894
Cheers
Posted by: Muckraker | March 02, 2011 at 06:40 PM
"A lawsuit against Gov. Rick Scott sends a question to the state Supreme Court that is more important than the high-speed train behind the controversy.
Does Florida's governor have the power to single-handedly change state law?"
Conservative leaders at the state and national level, who are usually defenders of the rule of law and the limits of constitutional authority, have been oddly silent on the issue.
Posted by: michel | March 03, 2011 at 11:51 AM