« Union dues bill rears its head as amendment | Main | Deal reached on higher education spending »

Ethics complaint filed against Miami lawmaker

A Tallahassee mother of three said she filed an ethics complaint on Wednesday against state Rep. Erik Fresen over his family's ties to a charter school company.

Fresen, a Miami Republican, voted in a Florida House committee last week for a broad charter schools reform bill.

He had previously helped slip language into the bill prohibiting cities and counties from imposing stricter building and zoning rules on charter schools than on traditional public schools. Charter schools are privately run but publicly funded.

Trish Thompson, who has three kids in the Leon County public school system, said she submitted the complaint because, in her view, Fresen should have disclosed a voting conflict on the proposal, HB 7195.

"I'm so tired of lawmakers that make laws to profit them," she said. "And I'm very concerned that all of the money is being shifted from the traditional public schools."

Fresen has repeatedly addressed questions raised about his relationship to Academica, the for-profit company that employs his brother-in-law and sister. (Thompson's complaint says Fresen's wife also works for the company a school run by Academica, but she does not, Fresen has said.)

On Thursday, Fresen, who asked for a copy of the complaint before he would comment because he had not yet received it, again scoffed at the suggestion that he has a conflict of interest.

"I consider this complaint to be another misguided attempt to create smoke where there is no fire," he said.

As a lawmaker, Fresen sits on several education committees in the state House. Legislators are required to disclose within 15 days any votes that could result in a "special private gain or loss" for themselves or their relatives.

A "special private" benefit is a narrow legal term that refers to a lawmaker voting on a matter that would benefit himself or his family -- and no one else. The charter schools bill, Fresen has noted, would affect all charter school companies -- not just Academica.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

JP Knight

Thus continuith the Democrats never-ending war on ANYTHING and ANYBODY that threatens the government/union school monopoly.

west coast guy

Mr or Ms. Knight, that's silly. There are people who are opposed to private people sucking off public money intended to educate children. The performance record of charter schools is worse than that for public schools.

Janemiami

I considere Fresen's simplified answer about "smoke screens" to be a smoke screen in and or itself. Where is he failing to understand the importance of the reasons for disclosure and how does he justify not doing so?

The comments to this entry are closed.