« House and Senate vote to keep federal government running until September | Main | Lawmakers walk political tightrope with immigration »

Scott lawyer to Supreme Court: My facts were wrong on high speed rail

It's likely too late to make a difference now, but Gov. Rick Scott's attorney on Thursday sent a letter to the Florida Supreme Court admitting he got a key fact wrong when he argued on behalf of the governor in a lawsuit challenging his decision to kill the high-speed rail project between Tampa and Orlando.

Scott attorney Charles Trippe told the court in oral arguments on March 3 that the state had spent $110 million of the $131 million appropriated by the federal government to build the line.

"In fact, approximately $31 million has been spent on the high speed rail project," Trippe wrote in a two-page letter to the court. "I sincerely regret the error."

Trippe blamed the mistake on miscommunication with the Florida Department of Transportation.

State Sens. Thad Altman and Arthenia Joyner filed the suit against the governor to compel him to allow the high-speed rail project to go forward. They argued that he had overstepped his executive authority by refusing to spend money appropriated by state lawmakers and moving forward with a project approved by the Legislature in a special session. But with a deadline looming to make a decision, the justices denied the petition, saying they had limited information on which to rule. As a result, the U.S. Department of Transportation yanked $2.4 billion designated for Florida to build the 84-mile bullet train.

Altman said he believes the dollar figure was critical to the case, because the large sum of unspent money shows the governor was "impounding" funds he was obligated to spend.

"We were approaching the end of the fiscal year. And if he spent $110 million out of the $131 million, how do you allege he's not implementing the law? He spent a vast majority of the money," Altman said. "But if it's only $30 million, and there are only four months left in the fiscal year, it's a stronger case."

Altman said he isn't sure if he will reopen the case. Doing so would not likely make a difference in terms of getting the money back to Florida to pay for the project. But it could make a point.

"There was a big misrepresentation of the facts. Would this be a legitimate reason to reopen this case and reassert that the governor misused his authority? Certainly, clearly it shows either his office didn't know what was going on or they misrepresented the facts," Altman said. "What is the bigger and more important question is the misuse of executive authority and not faithfully implementing the law. That applies not only to rail, but many other things."

A second suit has been filed in the Florida Supreme Court arguing that the governor overstepped his authority be freezing rules working their way through the rule-making process. The court has ordered the governor to submit a response to that case on April 25.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Randall McMurphy

Wow, another Scott lawyer lies. Like this is really something new.

George Fuller

The last thing Florida needs to do is build another perpetual taxpayer siphon to operate...

Another republican lier

The studies have already shown the line would have been profitable. Stop believing your tea party friends whom obviously have trouble with both the truth and reality, George.

Rozer

i like your article it such a good one

WC Green

And UPI reported on 14 April that "China High-Speed Trains to Slow Down" because they cost more to run than passengers want to pay.


http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2011/04/14/Chinas-high-speed-trains-to-slow-down/UPI-16411302755363/

sc mom

"..."China High-Speed Trains to Slow Down" because they cost more to run than passengers want to pay. .."

i read that link -- "Sheng said passengers had complained about high fares and said they were being forced to ride high-speed trains, as the ministry had canceled slower trains."

they don't want to pay because they don't HAVE it. that's what happens when people aren't paid a living wage.


The comments to this entry are closed.