« Florida primary delegate drama. Winner-take-all? Or proportional delegates? | Main | Newt Gingrich will cough up Freddie Mac contract »

Energy advocates: State nuclear cost recovery bill is unconstitutional

The state law that has allowed Florida Power & Light and Progress Energy to charge customers $1 billion so far for speculative nuclear power plants is unconstitutional, a group of energy advocates claims in a lawsuit before the state's highest court.

The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy is asking the Florida Supreme Court to throw out the 2006 law and reverse a decision by state regulators who have allowed the companies to charge customers for upgrading existing nuclear power plants and for the pre-construction costs of building new nuclear power plants that may never be built.

"State-sanctioned monopolies are using this nuclear-tax scam as an entitlement to extract money from consumers," said Stephen A. Smith, executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. "This a really bad deal for the consumers of Florida."

The alliance filed an appeal with the court in December, asking it to reject an order by the Public Service Commission in October that allowed FPL to collect $196 million from customers for nuclear projects in 2012. The order allowed Progress to collect $86 million for this year.

Smith argues that the law is unconstitutional because it gives "unbridled discretion" to the Public Service Commission, the state agency that regulates utilities, to "make up law as they go"by modifying and changing the rules intended by legislators.

Since the law was passed, he said, the prospects for building nuclear power plants in Florida have changed dramatically. The projected cost of construction has tripled, the need has declined, and the questions about safety have grown, he said.

Meanwhile, the PSC has continued to allow the companies to charge customers for prospective nuclear projects and, in FPL's case, use $172 million of the fees authorized for 2012 to pay for improvements to its existing Turkey Point plant in Miami-Dade County and its St. Lucie plant on Hutchinson Island.

"As we've said all along, right now, FPL is going through a rigorous, multi-year state and federal licensing process required to build a new plant," said FPL spokesman Michael Waldron.

But the company has not committed to building the new plant.

"Once the licenses are obtained, we will conduct an analysis of electricity needs, projected fuel costs, and consult with our regulators to determine the course that will ensure our customers continue to experience the reliable, affordable electricity that they have come to expect," Waldron said.

Smith argues that "the Legislature created a sloppy law that is unconstitutional" and believes the PSC should be requiring the utility companies to prove the need for the power plants, given the changing economy, before it authorizes fees to customers.

"The determination of need of five years ago has been predicated on what can now be considered erroneous data,"said Cindy Lerner, mayor of the Village of Pinecrest, which is about 15 miles from FPL's Turkey Point.

Lerner said there is growing community opposition to the proposed nuclear projects. In addition to Pinecrest, the Miami-Dade League of Cities and its 34 municipalities have passed resolutions urging the PSC to deny the requests for additional funding for nuclear reactors and want the Legislature to repeal the law.

The issue is a political hot potato for legislative leaders, however. Since 2007, they have refused to give hearings to bills that would repeal the nuclear-cost provisions.

Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, said a settlement agreement reached on Friday between Progress Energy and state regulators was proof that the company had pulled back from its commitment to build a new nuclear power plant in Levy County. The company agreed to reduce how much it will charge customers for the proposed plant, refund $288 million related to a controversial nuclear-plant repair in Crystal River and increase base electric rates by $150 million a year.

"That tells you right there that the nuclear power plant in Levy will never be built," Fasano said. "They should be honest with the ratepayers and with the Public Service Commission and refund the ratepayers their money."

Smith disagreed with the settlement, he said, because it encourages Progress to bring the Crystal River plant back online and will run the risk of "throwing good money after bad."


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mrs. AnnDe

If you were keeping up with Japan's nuclear plant meltdowns and the devastation it has brought to Japan's people; their land; their food supply; their water, etc...you would never want another nuclear plant built.

May I suggest a website to stay current on this issue (this is not spam; it's just an excellent site for staying informed on Japan's nuclear crisis and how it affects Japan and the U.S.) www.enenews.com


There were reports in Sunsentinel and Miami Herald that FP&L power plant had a radiated water situation. Or a leak from a crack in the floor allowed water from the cooling pond to leak into the groundwater-aquifer.
The cooling ponds are where the hot spent rods cool. No liner can contain the radiated water.
Read about exxcelon in Illinois-it was 2006-7 and the atty general was Lisa Madigan. She sued a company that had leaked radiated water into the Chicago drinking water supply.


But do the math-it was $280 Million refund and allowing them to raise $150 MILLION MORE in base rates. so approx. $130 Million less.
what is Fasano bragging about? 20 cents less in your electric bill.


Help us stop the same law getting passed here in Iowa. No to Nukes.


That suggests you won't ever fret about electricity packs


As application expenses keep improve, possibilities are you are doing all that you can to reduced the amount of power you use in your house. Both power and gas expenses are a issue for many family members these days. While there are some things you can do around your house, like switching off lighting or decreasing the temperature during the cold months season, sometimes you will need some outside help to find a way to reduced application invoice volumes.

The comments to this entry are closed.