« Lawmaker aims to prevent covert farm videos | Main | Fear and loathing of prison privatization »

LV Sands: Fresen's proposed amendments make casino bill 'less appealing'

The effort to find a politically palatable compromise that will get a destination resort casino bill through the House may have found its first casualty: Las Vegas Sands.

The Las Vegas casino giant, which was the first to bring the concept of a "destination resort" casino and convention center to Florida two years ago, says it would have a hard time supporting the bill if the amendments by sponsor Rep. Erik Fresen , R-Miami, get on the bill.

"My client, the Las Vegas Sands, has some concerns about the amendments that would make [the bill] less appealing,'' said Nick Iarossi, lobbyist for Sands.

Iarossi told the Herald/Times that specifically the idea of using tax revenues generated by the casino industry to buy back pari-mutuel permits for low performing horse and dog track and jai alai frontons is "causing some discomfort.''

 "The state has the ability to spend the money as it sees fit,'' Iarossi said, but using the revenues generated by the casinos to pay pari-mutuels "raises some policy flags for my client."

Meanwhile, Sands stands by its argument that three mega casinos in South Florida, as proposed in both Fresen's bill and the Senate companion bill, "are too many,'' he said. "We probably wouldn't build if there are three in South Florida."

Sands was the first to pitch the notion of a convention-based mega resort in Florida that would include a resort casino as part of it footprint but it was only when the Genting Group, the Maylasian-based casino and resort company, invested nearly $500 million in real estate purchases in Miami that the bills started moving. 

"For over two years we've pitched the benefits of a destination resort and the jobs it creates. Now it's up to the Legislature to authorize that concept or not,'' Iarossi said.

The Senate version of the bill by Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff is awaiting a hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee. The House is expected to hear Fresen's bill, and his proposed amendments to it, at the Business and Consumer Affairs Committee next week.

Among the opponents to the destination resort legislation have been several Central Florida lawmakers on the House committee who have said they will support the measure only if it bring a net reducton in gambling. Under Fresen's proposal, parimutuels could petition to have their permits bought back by the state. That could include the Sanford Orlando Kennel Club, and the Orlando Jai Alai in Seminole County, which closed in 2009.

Sands wants to see the bill continue to make progress, Iarossi said, and "certainly won't oppose it," if the changes are enacted because they believe "this bill is going to change a lot if it is going to pass.''



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John Balzer

Mary Ellen, thank you for a perfect report. While I am bias for the casino bill to go through, I am respectful of opinions on both sides. I continue to believe that this initiative is good for Florida, for jobs and for the tax base.


Isn't the fight over regulating or banning those nefarious neighborhood sweepstakes cafe casinos going to blow up the whole resort casino plan?

That would be one heck of a tail wagging the dog thing--in this case, a bad tail wagging a good dog.

Jill Binder

There is definitely room for three casinos in South Florida. The destination resorts are going to make Miami the greatest city in the world and save Florida from a continuation of double digit unemployment numbers and a hopeless society.


As a technical correction, Orlando Jai Alai didn't shut down in 2009. They are actually in the middle of a live meet right now. Sanford Orlando Kennel Club is also still operating.

The comments to this entry are closed.