« Marco Rubio returns to CPAC | Main | House passes spending plan »

Contra-Obama on contraception, Bill Nelson's runaway from the president becoming pattern

Sen. Bill Nelson told our Tampa Bay Times colleague Alex Leary that he disapproves of President Obama's controversial new rule concerning contraception offered by insurance plans of religious institutions. He said he called three White House officials to register his disapproval.

"My position is that church affiliated organizations should be exempt, not just churches," Nelson said.

Note: This doesn't mean Nelson opposes contraception. He probably just wants an exemption that would allow religiously run institutions that provide insurance to have the right not to offer contraceptive coverage.

Call this strike three in the Nelson-Obama relationship.

This summer, Nelson said the president has made some "mistakes," though he wouldn't elaborate on them. Nelson has said he opposed the way the administration handled NASA and the reaction to the Gulf oil-spill. Then, last month, Nelson was nowhere to be found next to Obama when the president paid a visit to Orlando. Now comes this.

Obama has a fundraiser in Coral Gables-Pinecrest at the end of the month. If the trend is any indication, Nelson probably won't be there.

Will it make a difference? Republican Senate frontruner Connie Mack is stumping the state and says with mantra-like efficiency that Nelson is a "lockstep liberal" because he has voted with the president about 98 percent of the time. So there's that.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tally Folly

Bill Nelson has always been a middle of the road statesman, and takes the sensible approach on this issue.
However, Marc there is no schism between the Senator and the President.

Joanne Renshaw

Romney: "We'll either have a government that protects religious diversity and freedom, or we'll have a government that tells us what kind of conscience they think we ought to have." This from the ex-governor who had similar legislation passed in Massachusetts.

How about a government that protects all persons' diversity and freedom, religious or otherwise; freedoms that Santorum, in particular, would like to replace with a Theocracy!

And, this same sentiment coming from all of the Republican candidates. They all try to enforce their views of morality as it applies to homosexuality, religious rituals in schools (as long it is Christian, must have!), abortion...etc. Is that not telling the American people what kind of conscience they think we ought to have?

If employees want to use contraception and other products/procedures banned by the their employers, they should seek other employment. The employers would soon run out of an employee pool from which to hire.

The Catholic lay people reject the contraction ban, or either they have given up having recreational sex. I know plenty of Catholics, and they choose contraception. Many Catholics also choose adultery, fornication, predatory priests, divorce and remarriage, etc. etc. The church is fighting a lost battle!

The comments to this entry are closed.