« Miami-Dade state attorney formally closes investigation into David Rivera's finances | Main | Rubio: I meant NFL commissioner, not VP »

Florida didn't save money by drug testing welfare recipients, data show

Required drug tests for people seeking welfare benefits ended up costing taxpayers more than it saved and failed to curb the number of prospective applicants, data used against the state in an ongoing legal battle shows.

The findings — that only 108 of the 4,086 people who took a drug test failed — are additional ammunition for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, which sued the state and won a temporary ban on the drug-testing program in October, said ACLU spokesman Derek Newton.

Attorneys for the state immediately appealed the ban, and will face off against the ACLU again at the 11th Circuit Court in Atlanta and the U.S. District Court in Orlando in coming months.

The costs and benefits of the law — and the outcome of the court case — could reverberate nationwide. This week, Georgia passed its own drug welfare law.

Since Gov. Rick Scott signed the bill into law last year, 25 states have considered similar legislation, Newton said.

Data about the law's cost may impact the court of public opinion, but Jenn Meale, a spokeswoman for the attorney general's office, said it won't play a role in the legal proceedings.

That's because ACLU's case rests on whether the law violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against "unreasonable searches" by the government.

"Any costs associated with the program are irrelevant to the analysis of whether the statute is constitutional," Meale said.

Of the 4,086 applicants who scheduled drug tests while the law was enforced, 108 people, or 2.6 percent, failed, most often testing positive for marijuana. About 40 people scheduled tests but canceled them, according to the Department of Children and Families, which oversees Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, known as the TANF program.

The numbers, confirming previous estimates, show that taxpayers spent $118,140 to reimburse people for drug test costs, at an average of $35 per screening.

The state's net loss? $45,780.

"That's not counting attorneys and court fees and the thousands of hours of staff time it took to implement this policy," Newton said.

The law also didn't impact the number of people who applied for benefits.

The findings don't ruffle supporters of the law, who say that its primary purpose is to make sure taxpayer money doesn't supplement drug use.

"It's not about money, it's about the drug issue," said Rep. Jimmie Smith, R-Lecanto, who sponsored the legislation. "It's about using every tool we have in the toolbox to fight drugs."

Jackie Schutz, a spokeswoman for the governor's office, said the governor agreed: The drug welfare law is about protecting children and getting parents back to work.

"It is important to ensure that people who receive TANF dollars use the cash assistance appropriately and not spend it on illegal drugs," she said.

Smith said he believes the law helps keep people off drugs and that there's undocumented savings in the form of less prison costs and fewer broken families.

He sponsored another bill in 2012, recently signed into law by Scott, to allow state agencies to drug test their employees and fire those who test positive.

That law is also expected to cost money and to yield lawsuits.

@britt_alana

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

plantlover

If there were 4,086 applicants this time, how many applicants were there before the drug testing policy was instituted?

Felix

This reporter claims, "The law also didn't impact the number of people who applied for benefits."

How on earth does the reporter know how many people would have applied had it not been for the drug test?

This is another example of left-wing bias from the Herald's Tallahasee bureau.

Tom Enix


Let see if I have this right.108 poeple fail.
Let's say they were receiving min 300$ a month.

Now that they have failed they shouldn't get any money. So now let do the math.

108(X)300$= 30,000 savings

40 people canceled thier appointment shouldn't get paid until they take the test.

40 (X) 300= 4000$
TOTAL SAVINGS 34,000

IF I DON'T WORK I DON'T GET PAID!

How many times would a person have to fail before they lose they will no longer allowed to apply for welfare?
How many time would I have fail a drug test at work before I'm fired.

This was just the beginning. You have to pay to play.
I look at this as an investment in the Florida people.
Not a LOSS.

Burma Pilot

This article is very misleading.

Those 108 people denied, would have received around $670. So 108 x $670 = $72,360

Minus the drug test costs: $72360 - $45780 = $26580 Florida SAVED

Not a big hunk of money, but still saved.

Britney Alana Davis needs to return to her "Introduction to Journalism" class and pay more attention. But if not, we can always figure out the truth.

Mel L.

This doesn't surprise me at all. Tax dollars should be allocated to more pressing issues we have such as dealing with our rising homeless issue. Drug testing welfare recipients is a waste of time.

The comments to this entry are closed.