« Counties lose round in online hotel tax dispute but appeal is likely | Main | Gov. Scott withdraws appointments (updated) »

Dems and Repubs bicker over who's to blame in failed redistricting deal

Slapped down by one Supreme Court ruling and facing years of partisan legal wrangling over the Legislature’s redistricting plans, the Senate’s top Republican quietly met with the head of the Florida Democratic Party last month to discuss a deal that could end the lawsuits.

It didn’t work. Now, while both sides agree the meetings took place, each suggests the other is misrepresenting the reason the deal was rejected.

Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, the chairman of the Senate Redistricting Committee, told the Herald/Times Monday that he was approached repeatedly by former state Sen. Steve Geller, D-Hallandale Beach, who served as an intermediary for Florida Democratic Party Chairman Rod Smith.

Gaetz said he agreed to meet with Smith “because I will meet with anybody” but when Smith asked to meet him away from the Capitol, Gaetz said he refused.

“I told him I didn’t have the authority to negotiate a deal,’’ Gaetz said. “I felt it was inappropriate and I felt it was unethical.”

Smith confirmed Monday that he met with Gaetz “two or three times” to find a way “to move the process forward more quickly, and get more finality.”

The Florida Supreme Court had approved the House’s redistricting map March 9, the last day of the regular session, but rejected the Senate’s map as “rife with indicators of improper intent.”

Gov. Rick Scott called legislators called back into an extraordinary session March 15 to redraw the map. In the interim, Smith and Gaetz met.

Smith told the Herald/Times that if Gaetz thought the entreaties were unethical, “he didn’t raise that point with me. If fact, quite the contrary, he said, ‘let’s keep talking.”

Geller confirmed he gave Gaetz a map, drawn by the Florida Democratic Party, which he forwarded to Gaetz’s private gmail account.

 “He said, ‘Can you send it to me? I said, ‘Absolutely. Give me your email address,” Geller recalled. Geller said he wrote it down wrong so Gaetz “called me back the following morning and said he didn’t get it, so I resent it.”

The map also came with an offer: “He said he wanted to make a deal that could make Democratic opposition go away,” Gaetz recalled.

Both Geller and Gaetz confirmed the offer meant Democrats would bring more House and Senate Democratic votes to support the Senate map; the Democratic Party would file a legal brief before the Florida Supreme Court supporting the plan; and Senate Democrats would agree not to challenge Gaetz’s Senate presidency.

According to a Herald/Times analysis, a draft of the map sent to Gaetz would have created three more Democratic leaning districts, including one in Smith’s hometown of Alachua, bringing the total to 18. It would have pitted Republican Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff of Fort Lauerdale against a potential Democrat in Palm Beach County and created a Democratic-based seat in Volusia and Alachua counties.

It also would have created 22 Republican-dominated Senate districts. By contrast, the final map the Senate sent to the Florida Supreme Court includes 23 Republican-leaning seats, 15 Democratic-leaning seats and two swing districts.

Gaetz also suggested that while he did not know if Smith, a former state senator from Alachua, had plans to return to the Senate but if he did the Democrat’s proposed map “would be a Rod Smith slam dunk.”

Smith bristles at the suggestion by Gaetz and Republican political consultants who suggest that the Democrat’s map was intended to benefit Smith.

“They asked me flat out if was a candidate for the Senate and I said no,’’ he said. “I recruited a family friend to run for the seat with an understanding if the seat was cut more favorable he could be our candidate.’’

The candidate, Brian Scarborough, has opened a campaign account and Smith said he’s working to support Scarborough’s campaign.

Geller said that any suggestion that the map was drawn to personally benefit Smith “is laughable.” The goal, instead, was to urge Senate leadership to “draw a map that would be more bi-partisan and would still comply with what the court wanted.”

Geller said he believe the Senate’s second map will also be deemed unconstitutional. “It was drawn to follow as close as they could with what the Supreme Court said but to comply with what the Republican leadership wanted,’’ he said.

“There’s nothing wrong with this,’’ he said. “It was an attempt by Rod Smith to try to come up with a map that both the Florida Democratic Party and the Senate Republican leadership could live with – and hopefully avoid additional litigation.”

Geller now questions the decision by Gaetz to talk about the deal. “They’re trying to stir up dissention,’’ he said. “They hope perhaps a Supreme Court justice might read this and give it some credence.”

Gaetz strongly disagrees. He said that if Republicans accepted the map offered by Democrats, the Senate would have violated the constitutional prohibition against drawing a map that benefits a political party.

“The Supreme Court had already told us that result proves intent,’’ he said. “…How could I enter into a deal that had political results and then stand in front of the court to say I had no political intent?”

Tampa Bay Times researcher Darla Cameron contributed to this report.

Mary Ellen Klas can be reached at meklas@MiamiHerald.com and on Twitter @MaryEllenKlas

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.