« FL Supreme Court hears foreclosure appeal | Main | As oil rig drills off Cuba's coast, embargo could threaten safety »

Hunt for 180,000 possible non-citizen voters exposes partisan divide

Amid an increasingly partisan dog fight, Florida elections officials say the number of potential non-citizens they’re examining on the state voter rolls is far higher than what was initially reported: 180,000.

Florida’s Division of Elections said Thursday that it’s combing through this initial, mammoth list of names -- which were flagged during a computer database search -- to make sure its list is as clean and as small as possible.

The state is then turning over smaller batches of the more-verified names to local county election supervisors, who are contacting the potential non-citizens to see if they can lawfully vote.

By the end of the process, the state could send counties as many as 22,000 names to check, one election source indicated, in a state with more than 12 million total voters.

Right now, supervisors have been sent nearly 2,700 names, about 2,000 of which are in Miami-Dade, Florida’s most-populous and most-immigrant heavy county.

Some Democrats accuse the Republican-appointed Secretary of State Ken Detzner of engaging in a type of “voter suppression.” But Detzner’s office said he’s trying to make sure no unlawful votes are cast -- and it indicated that Obama’s Administration is stonewalling the effort by refusing to share Department of Homeland Security databases that could more easily show who’s a citizen and who’s not.

“We have been requesting DHS access since September of last year,” said Florida’s Division of Elections spokesman, Chris Cate. “We can do our checks. But we’re restricted in the level of confirmation we can do. We need help from the federal government. But so far, we’ve been unsuccessful.”

DHS has yet to comment.

U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Miami, said in a written statement that DHS shouldn’t cooperate.

“The Florida Republicans’ desire to use Department of Homeland Security information – which is for the purpose of thwarting terrorists and not to engage in yet another round of voter suppression – would set a dangerous precedent,” she said, “by not only taking away citizens’ constitutional right to vote but by giving state governments free rein to invade innocent Americans’ privacy.”

At the other end of the state, in the Panhandle, Republican Congressman Jeff Miller asked DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano in a letter Wednesday to furnish its data to Florida to make sure only lawful voters cast ballots.

The effort in Florida was inspired by Colorado’s Republican Secretary of State Scott Gessler, who said last year that he initially identified a pool of 16,000 potential non-citizens voters in his state. New Mexico — also run by a Republican Secretary of State — searched and found 104.

Florida, Colorado and New Mexico are all immigrant- and Hispanic-heavy swing states that could play a crucial role in this year’s presidential election.

The computer searches aren’t a clear sign of voter fraud or of non-citizens being registered to vote. Florida, like the others, performed the searches by comparing its voter rolls with its Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle database, which now reflect citizenship status of relatively new drivers.

But the highway-agency data can be out of date when it comes to the issue of citizenship. The highway database isn’t updated to show when a person becomes a citizen.

As a result, three people contacted by the Miami Herald on Wednesday said they became citizens after they got their IDs — but before they registered to vote. Still, they were flagged as potential non-citizens.

An initial database search by the election division yielded the 180,000 names. The division then began double-checking the identities of those names and whiddled down its list. The names it sends to counties will grow by the day.

Those who have initially been identified by the state as potential non-citizen voters are being contacted by mail. They have 30 days to respond. After that, county elections supervisors will advertise their names in publications of general circulation.

If the voters still haven’t come forward with proof of citizenship about 30 days after that, they’ll be removed from the rolls. If some illegally cast ballots, they could be prosecuted for voter fraud, a third-degree felony. Voting in Florida is reserved for state residents who are over the age of 18 and are U.S. citizens.

After reading in the Miami Herald about the plight of one elderly disabled voter who might have been wrongfully identified as a non-citizen, Miami-Dade’s election department said it would contact her to ensure she remains on the rolls.

An initial Miami Herald examination of a partial list of 350 potential non-citizen voters in Miami-Dade showed that less than a third have cast ballots and that the rolls were evenly split between Republicans and Democrats.

State Rep. Carlos Lopez-Cantera, a Miami Republican and head of the Miami-Dade legislative delegation, said the elections department and elected officials’ offices should help voters who have been flagged in error.

"If any of those are wrong, the elections department should make every effort to make it easier for the voter to prove their citizenship," Lopez-Cantera said. "I would recommend that if a voter needs help in the logistics of this, they would call a local official. One of their offices should send someone to help them."

State officials point out that it’s against the law to allow non-citizens to vote, but Democrats and liberals are suspicious of what they see as a “purge.”

State Rep. Dwight Bullard, a South Miami-Dade Democrat, said targeting non-citizens on the voter rolls "is going to be problematic."

"You’re purging based on name, and sometimes people who are active citizens will get caught up in that because they share a common surname with somebody else," he said.

"It’s convenient for some, it would seem, to purge the voter rolls this election, especially for the party in power," he said. "I would foresee any number of lawsuits that could potentially take place for violations."


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


There is absolutely NO defensible reason for objecting to ensuring that only eligible voters are on the rolls. Even Dem pundits are beginning to acknowledge that their party has missed the boat on this one. The vote must remain sacred if we are to have any chance of making it to our 300th.

Richard Tryon

With the degree of polarization in current US political parties, it is imperative to give assurances to all that everything possible be done in every state to avoid fraud. Unfortunately, the opportunity to be fraudulent is greater in some places than others and with greater or lesser consequence.

This election is seminal and to win with a cloud of doubt lingering is not helpful to either side unless only one has something to hide?

Martin Terris

While driver registration cannot disprove the citizenship of legal aliens (because many can and do gain US citizenship after getting their licenses), it does document the citizenship of of most drivers smf Florida ID holders. So why doesn't the State use the driver registration rolls to register new voters instead of enacting legislation to ban most voter registration dirves? Clearly, the legislature and the governor are afraid of young and minority voters.

Sean Graham-White

You have a greater chance of being struck by lightning than of committing voter fraud ... .0004% Voter fraud is a NON-issue as it comes with stiff penalties. The real issue is election fraud -- committed by those involved in, conducting, counting the election, etc.

Al Breeck

Legalized voter 'caging' is what this is. That was a despicable trick used by the Bush team that targeted patriotic brave African Americans who had been DEPLOYED TO IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN, with the presumption they would vote DEMOCRATIC.

IF they failed to respond to mail to their stateside addresses, then their voter registration was cancelled!

The targeting of registered Hispanic voters is obviously designed to reduce the number of Democrats voting, otherwise the same measures would be applied to ensure that wealthy WASPish retirees really are residents of Florida.

S,.W. Anderson

This purge targeting immigrants, racial and ethnic minorities is patently unconstitutional. Our legal system doesn't send out warning notices to everyone who might possibly be guilty of armed robbery (a felony) telling them to come in and prove they're not guilty.

If authorities investigating a crime believe someone is guilty of armed robbery, it's up to them to apprehend, arrest, read rights, incarcerate, formally charge within 72 hours and take to arraignment, and eventually try the case in court. Throughout all of this the suspect is considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. What Florida's Republican voter-suppression authorities are doing turns the presumption of innocence on its head, which is itself illegal.

Assuming the state has some competent attorneys with a conscience and a court that's not corrupted by the GOP's long dominance of state government, there's hope this bizarre travesty will be stopped in its tracks.

If Republicans want to purge the voter registration rolls of all those devious dark-skinned people with funny-sounding furriner names, then Republican legislators will have to appropriate the money to pay for proper case-by-case investigations. I'm sure Florida's taxpayers will be forever grateful for that, when the investigations cost tens of millions and yield a small fraction, at most, of illegally registered voters.


I can see the reasoning for asking the Department of Homeland Security for a copy of the list on the database of the illegal immigrants, but as slippery and sloppy as they are of keeping track of these people it most likely isn't acurate anyway. I wish you luck. I have to present identity and proof of residence in the precinct when I vote so the minorities should too. If they don't like it; TUFF!!

The comments to this entry are closed.