« Rep. David Rivera stumps for votes at Gay Republican club | Main | Rep. Bill Hager, the Florida Legislature's duly elected birther-tweeter-jokester »

Justices fire back in controversy over their campaign paperwork

Florida's three Supreme Court justices, who are under fire for using court staff to assist them in their last-minute completion of their paperwork needed to meet the deadline for their merit retention campaigns, shot back on Thursday with a letter from a well-regarded constitutional law expert.

Lawyer Barry Richard, who has presided before the court on numerous cases and represented George W. Bush in the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision, sided with the justices that they did nothing wrong.

"It has been common practice in Florida for many years for deputies and employees in the officers of supervisors of elections and court clerks to notarize documents filed in such offices when requested by members of the public,'' Richard wrote in in a legal opinion sought by the judges' campaign counsel. "...Such notarization is offered as a public service" and "does not indicate that the notary endorses the candidacy of the person filing the documents'' Download Opinion_letter_to_DStengle[1]

Justices Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince took a rare hour-long break in a redistricting hearing two weeks ago because state elections officials informed them they hadn't completed the proper paperwork to conduct their merit retention elections. Supreme Court justices and appelate court justices in Florida must appear on the ballot every six years and ask voters if they remain qualified to stay in office.

The justices scrambled to complete their required oath of office and financial disclosure forms by the noon deadline and then used court staff to notarize them.

The judges are facing opposition from a Tea Party-backed group, based in Orlando. When the group said they believed the justices had violated a law that prohibits state workers from assisting a campaign during state time, Rep. Scott Plakon, a Longwood Republican, wrote to the governor last week asking for an investigation.

Barry said he believed the state law "was clearly not intented to prohibit public employees from engaging in politically neutral activities that are within the scope of their regular public employment and that are intended to be performed during working hours."

The governor's office said while he is considering asking the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to look into the matter, he has not made any request.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Cyrano Bull

Barry Richard is no constitutional expert. He is the lawyer for The Florida Bar. The Florida Bar is presently spending $300,000 illegally to try to secure retention of these three Justices. It is a vioaltion of two US Supreme Court cases, Lathrop and Keller, for a state bar to spend money in this fashion--for a political cause or candidates.

This article also does not disclose that Barry Richard, according to Secretary of State records has donated campaign cash to only three candidates in the upcoming general election. Guess which three? These three Supreme Court Justices!

So let's not pretend Barry Richard is some kind of constitutional oracle. He is a gun hired by The Florida Bar to try to paper over the illegal acts, the serial attacks on the US Constitution, by the Florida Supreme Court. Jack Thompson, Miami, 305-666-4366, amendmentone@comcast.net

The comments to this entry are closed.