« Attorney General Pam Bondi: 'We are blessed to be happily in love' | Main | Broward elections supervisor says voter rolls are clean »

New poll reveals Florida is still very divided over casino gambling

A new survey by Tampa pollster Paul Fallon shows that Floridians haven't budged too much from previous polls on their views about casino gambling: they're still deeply divided with 50 percent in support and 43 percent opposed. The percentage of people in support has grown, however, compared to a Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times poll in January which found that 44 percent of likely voters in Florida opposed casino gambling while 42 percent were opposed, with a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

Here's Fallon's assessment:

 I just completed the spring installment of the quarterly Florida Omnibus SurveyTM for my various clients, and decided to also include a question to gauge general interest in the concept of allowing casinos to be built in areas that already have gaming. The results indicate that this is a highly-polarizing topic within Florida that divides voters among many lines, such as age, party, race and gender. Overall, 50% of voters supported the idea, while 43% opposed it and 7% were unsure. However, sub-group analysis tells a very different story, which illustrates the many political cross-currents affecting this issue.

For example, as the graphic insert illustrates, the idea was supported by a majority of men (56% to 39%), but opposed by a plurality of women (44% to 47%). Similarly, it was supported by a majority of 18-to-29 year olds (59% to 31%), but opposed by a plurality of senior citizens 60 years of age or older (44% to 47%). Results by political party paint another picture of how treacherous the topic may be, as it was supported by a majority of independents and voters of other minor parties or those who are unaffiliated (57% to 36%), and plurality of Democrats (48% to 42%), but Republicans were divided about it (48% to 48%). Moreover, a majority of white voters supported it (53% to 40%), while Hispanic/Latino voters were split (48% to 48%), and it was opposed by a majority of African-Americans (35% to 55%).

Although this was a concept test, and legislation or an amendment would look quite different, this data seems to presage the great difficulty that might be encountered in building a consensus about the idea. Please note that this question was not funded or commissioned by any candidate, organization, association or committee. It was included in the survey because I believe that this is a topical matter that may be of interest to people with whom I work and professionally associate. If you have any questions about this data or would like to discuss it, please feel free to call me at 813-283-2665.

This information is based on survey data that was gathered through telephone interviews that specially-trained opinion research interviewers conducted with 802 randomly-selected registered voters in the State of Florida who had valid residential or cellular telephone numbers and recent histories of voting in past even-year general elections. The interviews were performed during the period of May 23, 2012 through May 25, 2012. The overall estimated margin of sampling error is +/- 3.46%, based on a confidence level of 95%, although it varies for each individual question. This means that if this survey was repeated, 95 times out of 100 the results would be within plus or minus 3.46% of those provided herein. Adjustments were made to weight the results toward geographic and demographic characteristics of the state, in order to account for under- and over-sampling that normally occurs as a result of the random selection process, to ensure that all major sub-groups are represented in proportion to their actual percentages of the electorate.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Game on!


Deal the first legal hand, collect the taxes,and silence the opposition!

The comments to this entry are closed.