« Regulators start FPL rate case and dust up by allowing settlement talk | Main | Attorney General Pam Bondi appoints new solicitor general »

Lost in translation: GOP platform DOES include Cuba travel restrictions

Memo to those assembling the GOP platform for the upcoming Republican National Convention: Don't say restrictions on Cuba trade aren't a plank when it is.

A GOP platform that mentions support for the Cuban embargo isn't news. It's like Republicans affirming their support for tax cuts. A GOP platform without Cuba? That's news. Very big news.

So when the Los Angeles Times today attended an RNC platform meeting and two Republican officials mentioned that Cuba wasn't part of the platform, it obviously was news. Very big news. After all, Republican vice-presidential pick Paul Ryan had an anti-embargo voting record until about 2007, Republican Cuba experts say. After that, they say, Ryan became more pro-embargo (more here).

Mitt Romney's campaign quickly responded to the story by noting that the platform does include language that supports restrictions on Cuba. And they blame the story on supporters of Congressman Ron Paul, a free-trader.

"Alternatively, we will stand with the true democracies of the region against both Marxist subversion and the drug lords, helping them to become prosperous alternatives to the collapsing model of Venezuela and Cuba.

"We affirm our friendship with the People of Cuba and look toward their reunion with the rest of our hemispheric family. The anachronistic regime in Havana which rules them is a mummified relic of the age of totalitarianism, a state-sponsor of terrorism. We reject any dynastic succession of power within the Castro family and affirm the principles codified in U.S. law as conditions for the lifting of trade, travel, and financial sanctions: the legalization of political parties, an independent media, and free and fair internationally-supervised elections. We renew our commitment to Cuba’s courageous pro-democracy movement as the protagonists of Cuba’s inevitable liberation and democratic future. We call for a dedicated platform for the transmission of Radio and TV Marti and for the promotion of Internet access and circumvention technology as tools to strengthen the pro-democracy movement. We support the work of the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba and affirm the principles of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966, recognizing the rights of Cubans fleeing Communism."

That's pretty standard, boilerplate stuff.

However there is one possible omission: The platform doesn't explicitly call for reversing the executive decision of President Obama that allowed for more travel to Cuba.

Romney's camp, including Cuba-crackdown leader and former Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart, says no additional language is needed, in great part because Romney's campaign notes that he explicitly opposes Obama's executive decision to loosen travel and remittances to Cuba.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

joe blow

I'm sure the crazy Cubans in Hialeah will be happy. Yeah that embargo thing has really worked hasn't it? 60 years and Castro is still in power!
Viva Fidel!


The reality is that we should have invaded and deposed the Castro family ... with their "communist" ideology ... decades ago.

The idiots who dwell in the current small-minded debate over whether we should or shouldn't trade with Cuba are missing the major frakking point.

Cuba belongs to the Cuban people ... and the Castros and their sycophant minions have never truly allowed the Cuban people to assemble freely and propose a constitution and vote on such a plan for their self-government.

It is bizarre that we in the U.S. will send our troops half-way around the world to Irag to deliver some Arabs from an evil dictator ... and yet not bother to take a few months and very few of our soldiers lives to liberate Cuba.


Why can't Americans travel to Cuba like we can to other dictatorships. It's a hypocritical policy- if we're going to be restricted from travel to one country than we should be restricted from all who are dictatorships. I for one do not want tougher restrictions. Years of these policies have failed. Does not mean I support Castro or like dictatorships. It simply means Cuba has been singled out and it's time for a consistent policy.

Havana Journal

Old Cuban Americans in Miami take too much from US government every year to "study" Cuba and "promote democracy" in Cuba to EVER give up their hard line stance against Cuba.

Doesn't matter how many decades the Embargo fails or even who is in power in Cuba... unless and/or until it is one of them.

Very sad for many people.


Good solid legislation at work in the Cuba Embargo. Only a supporter of Communism/fascism/socialism can support doing business with another communist/fascist/socialist.
Unless forced by a tyrannical regime, you just don't do it.


Vicky, by using that logic, all of our presidents since Nixon have been Communists/Fascists/Socialists, considering our very good economic relationship with China where we feed billions into their economy and oppressive government every year. And that's not to mention Pakistan, Vietnam, and the rest of the bad bunch that we support or maintain relations with as a nation despite their authoritarianism.

The comments to this entry are closed.