« FL Dems shredding each other over party chair race. Will Taddeo-Goldstein drop out? | Main | Florida will miss health exchange deadline, feds to step in »

Lawmakers discuss wise use of tax dollars for crime

Following a three-day Smart Justice Summit held in Orlando, Sen. Greg Evers, chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee; Rep. Dennis Baxley, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; and Sen. Rob Bradley, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal & Civil Justice – talked about solutions for saving money and decreasing recidivism, while still being tough on crime.

Many of the ideas came from Smart Justice, which administered a public opinion poll to find out how Floridians want public officials to spend their tax dollars when it comes to crime. Among other things, the poll found that three-quarters of Floridians believe a lawmaker can support programs to lower recidivism while still being considered “tough on crime,” according to a Smart Justice news release.

Many of the poll questions centered around whether initiatives to lower prison time for non-violent offenders would lead to a candidate being labeled by constituents as soft on crime.  

Among the poll’s findings:

73 percent of the public favors laws that would reduce the number of non-violent criminals in Florida prisons.                                                                                                                                           78 percent believe a person can support Smart Justice initiatives and still be considered “tough on crime”
81 percent favor cost-effective treatment programs to prepare non-violent criminals to re-enter society
89 percent favor laws to establish supervised work release where the earnings would pay back victims, pay court costs or pay child support
73 percent favor sentencing laws that reduce the number of non-violent criminals in Florida prisons, saving substantial tax dollars
70 percent are more likely to support reforms when they are told that almost one-third of those released under current laws end up back in prison, but recidivism is substantially lower in states that have already implemented these programs
60 percent reject the notion that the number of crimes will go up if the threat of prison is removed for non-violent criminals


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Glad to know our politicians are more concerned with their image than doing the right thing.


Citizens are so misled by this poll. 89% favor work release for inmates. The public perception is that the Department of Corrections runs work release with FDLE Certified Correctional Officers who are counting heads, conducting contraband searches and have the responsibility and statutory authority needed for the care, custody and control of the INMATES. Does the public support work release being run by a company with the goal (besides making money) and mission statement to provide a therapeutic environment to inmates with responsibility to also provide care, custody and control by non-officers? There are inmates with very violent offenses that are transferred to work release toward the end of their prison sentence. Only in corrupt Florida can you take the Smart on Crime Movement and turn it into a bunch of "providers" lining up for contracts. It's one thing to provide private re-entry services to inmates and something entirely different to have these providers be responsible for the security and control aspect of protecting the citizens. Do you want therapists responsible for INMATES?

The comments to this entry are closed.