Gov. Rick Scott’s proposal for $480 million in pay increases for teachers will have a tough test in the Florida House.
The problem is how Scott wants to distribute the pay increase: across the board, everyone gets it.
House leaders, led by Speaker Will Weatherford, prefer the raises to be distributed in a method that recognizes performance.
“We applaud the governor’s efforts to increase money in education funding,” Weatherford, R-Wesley Chapel, told Naked Politics on Wednesday. “That being said, the method of the increase is just as important. We are supportive of merit pay.”
Specifically, the merit pay method outlined in SB 736, which lawmakers passed in 2011 in the first two weeks of a tea party infused session and was the first bill that Scott ever signed. It eliminated teacher tenure while creating a system that evaluated teachers based on student test scores. It tied pay to performance for new teachers. The Florida Education Association has sued, claiming the bill eliminates the right for teachers to collectively bargain.
Although Scott seems to have backed away from that law with his insistence that all teachers get an across the board increase, Weatherford is holding firm, saying the compensation system in SB 736 is a good one and should be followed.
“Where the debate in the how will be how do we do it, how do we increase teacher pay,” Weatherford said. “Part of it should be performance.”












Picking winners and losers is not the way to go Governor Scott. You know that and you have run your businesses so that those that get results get rewarded. Your advisers need to learn that as well.
An across the board pay raise means that teachers who have worked one year will receive a larger percentage raise than a teacher of 10,20 or longer years of service. You fail to realize that aides are a valuable part of the education process as well as other school support personnel.
What about the other state employees who have done outstanding work for the state. They are ignored? Or do the raises only go to those working directly to Weatherford and Gatez staff?
Go back to your conservative values and principals it appears that you moderate to quickly.
Posted by: Johnathon | January 23, 2013 at 03:23 PM
Disagree with Weatherford. The purpose of this pay increase is not a performance type of reward, rather to address the statewide problem of low paid teachers. There should be an additional proposal for a budget to reward teachers.
Posted by: Daniel | January 23, 2013 at 03:35 PM
Performance based raises are nice if there's a recognized and consistent method of performance evaluations and in Florida there is NOT one.
Posted by: Randall McMurphy | January 23, 2013 at 04:27 PM