« Report says Weatherford's pension reform might cost more | Main | Obama's new immigration plan: 8-year pathway to permanent residency for the undocumented »

AFL-CIO group says report bolsters case against Weatherford's pension reform

The Florida Retirement Security Coalition issued a stinging rebuke on Saturday of Florida House Speaker Will Weatherford’s efforts to reform Florida’s pension system.

Ok, that’s hardly news coming from an outfit managed by the AFL-CIO. It’s no secret the group opposes HB 7011, which would force all public employees hired by agencies enrolled in the state’s $136 billion pension plan to sign-up instead with 401-k plans after January 2014. The coalition has even published a 19-page report arguing that the plan is fiscally sound and needs no major overhaul.

But the group pegged Saturday’s lament on a report released Friday that had been ordered by Weatherford to study the economic impact of the reform. It surely wasn’t Weatherford’s hope that the report would be used as ammo against his proposal.

The study was done by Milliman, a Vienna, VA firm that is among the world’s largest providers of actuarial services.  It warned that the traditional pension plan, which Weatherford has vowed would remain intact, would rely on a shrinking payroll base on which contributions to retirees are made. This would require the contribution rates to increase as a share of payroll. 

How to pay for the growing gap? Workers could pay more in contributions, which are now capped at 3 percent, or local governments and agencies would need to kick in the difference. They might have to kick in more money to make the plan fiscally sound because of the plan’s diminished capability of making long-term investments as the number of contributors erode over time, the report surmised.

That was the opening the coalition needed.

“There is clearly a significant cost associated with this plan,” said Gary Rainey, president of Florida Firefighters. “But the legislature apparently thinks price is no object – probably because they don’t intend to be the ones footing the bill.

“Not only does the legislature want to eliminate retirement security for thousands of public servants like school teachers, firefighters and police but they are likely to expect local governments to shoulder the financial burden,” Rainey added.

There will be other interpretations of the 49-page report, which is mostly actuarial tables, but the coalition was the first one to officially react to it.

Here’s the release:

Florida Retirement Security Coalition’s Response to the Actuarial Analysis

(STATEWIDE, FL) In response to the actuarial analysis of the plan to shutter the state’s public pension system, the Florida Retirement Security Coalition released the following statement:

Florida’s public pension system is financially sound. The plan to end this system and move all new employees into 401(k) plans is clearly not, as the study released yesterday shows.

Last week, in a stunningly irresponsible move, the legislative committee charged with “studying this issue” rammed through a bill before they had any idea what it would cost.

Why would the Florida Legislature even consider a proposal that will pass along huge costs to local governments and taxpayers?

“There is clearly a significant cost associated with this plan,” said Gary Rainey, president of Florida Firefighters. “But the legislature apparently thinks price is no object – probably because they don’t intend to be the ones footing the bill.

“Not only does the legislature want to eliminate retirement security for thousands of public servants like school teachers, firefighters and police but they are likely to expect local governments to shoulder the financial burden,” Rainey added.

The bottom line is this: “Under the current proposal, Florida taxpayers will pay more for retirees to get less,” said Alan Stonecipher, director of the Florida Retirement Security Coalition. “It’s a bad deal for taxpayers and a bad deal for workers.”

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

D

A Pontiac Michigan Judge found a third way to pay for unfunded Pensions. He Ordered that all property owners in the District will pay an additional 6+ mils on their property taxes. Yes I wrote 6+ mils which in our case will add roughly 30% to our property tax bills.

Pat Kelley

Our legislature is more creative. They want to funnel the FUNDED pensions into the pockets of financial services companies.

Anti-Tallahassee

D, your post at 0335 proves that you need sleep or the D in your user name stands for Dumb. Weatherford's plan would be the only plan that leads to large assessments by local governments. It's quite disconcerting that the media and the public do not recognize the war being waged by Tallahassee Republicans against local governments and school boards. The Tallahassee Repugnants have been consolidating power by passing Amendment 1, the Marco Rubio initiative that limits local governments while doing nothing to State government. Then they have pushed unfunded mandates, underfunded essential services, etc... The goal is to consolidate power in Tallahassee in order to reap the most benefit from their unfettered power. Lobbyists, special interest groups, etc... will not have to worry about 67 counties or the hundreds of city governments. They will just dump their "contributions" in Tallahassee and reap the rewards of crony crapitalism engineered by Tallahassee Republicans.

pmath

Anti-Tallahassee, Just a point of clarity for your post. The Republicans in the FL Legislature are not "Tallahassee Republicans". They are Republicans from everywhere in the state EXCEPT Tallahassee. The Tallahassee legislators are Democrats. Tallahassee just gets the "pleasure" of hosting all of the legislators that are sent up from around the state.

The comments to this entry are closed.