« The swanky W South Beach hotel offends Cuban-Americans with giant Che Guevara-like photo | Main | FSU film students: Nobody asked us about leaving West Palm Beach »

UltraViolet's Marco Rubio-basher: "Republican Savior Votes Against VAWA"


Hours before giving tthe GOP rebuttal to President Obama's State of the Union speech, Sen. Marco Rubio voted against the new version of the Violence Against Women Act. In the past, Rubio said he'd support re-upping the law as currently written and that he didn't like the way the new legislation affects how states spend money on domestic-violence response or prevention.

But the Republican Rubio didn't have the opportunity to vote for the current VAWA. The Democratic Senate made sure he voted for its new version.

The resulting press release:

Statement from Nita Chaudhary, Co-Founder of UltraViolet:

"Tonight Marco Rubio, the so-called savior of the Republican Party, will stand before the nation and try to offer a glimpse into the newly re-branded Republican Party. But in politics, and in life, actions speak louder than words and Rubio's vote this afternoon, a mere hours before his big primetime address, against the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) tells you everything you need to know about Marco Rubio and the Republican Party.

"Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women—more than car accidents, muggings, and rapes combined. Three women die every single day as a result of domestic violence. And VAWA has helped save countless lives and helped reduce violence. Today's vote by Rubio, and the actions of his Republicans colleagues in the House, has put millions of women at risk. Don't be fooled by any soft rhetoric tonight. Rubio and the Republican Party have not learned the lesson of the 2012 election and their War on Women wages on and knows no bounds."


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dave mead

Wow, really? I was really impressed! Come on, a Cubani who can actually read a Teleprompter? How can you not be impressed?!!!!!

Connie St George

That's why they lost - until they take women's issues more seriously they will stay out of power.


The Violence Against Women Act needs to protect the approximately 50% of victims who happen to be male. Until it treats all victims equally, there will be plenty who oppose it. How about something called the Domestic Violence Prevention Act? Or would THAT protect too many people, including straight men?

The comments to this entry are closed.