« Foundation for Florida's Future tries to rally support for parent trigger | Main | Political winds shift, nationwide and in Florida, on same-sex marriage »

Lawmakers grapple with future of special-needs students

For an afternoon, Mariah Harris wasn’t just the girl with Down syndrome. She was the star of the Senate Education Committee meeting.

“I need a real high school diploma,” the sixth-grader told the panel last week, her sequined headband glittering in the artificial light. “My dream is to go to college with my friends one day. I want to buy a condo and live on a golf course.”

Mariah and her mother traveled 452 miles from Broward County to champion a bill that they say would let the parents of special-needs students play a larger role in their child’s education. For Mariah, the proposed legislation could mean the difference between a special diploma and a standard diploma, her mother said.

The bill has spurred some of the most emotional moments of this year’s legislative session. But it has also met resistance from some advocacy groups, who say teachers and schools personnel — not parents — should have the final word in determining a child’s educational goals.

A provision that would allow parents to contract with private therapists during school hours is also drawing ire; some observers see it as an attempt to further the school-privatization agenda.

“This usurps the power of the schools at the most basic level,” said Kathleen Oropeza, of the Orlando-based parent group, Fund Education Now. “Can you imagine a class of 15 [special-education] kids with 15 hired consultants in the classroom?”

Read the rest of the story here.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

No More Rick Scott

"The court found that the facts "are sufficient to create a reasonable doubt'' that "at least five of Columbia's directors, including Scott,'' should have known their actions could have drawn a federal investigation, the court wrote in its opinion.

The facts, the court said, "presented a substantial likelihood of director liability for intentional or reckless breach of the duty of care.''

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2010/10/state-once-sued-rick-scott-for-insider-trading-court-raised-questions-about-him.html#storylink=cpy

The comments to this entry are closed.