Note: This blog's templates will be updated this afternoon to a responsive design bringing it in line with

At that time, we will also change to the Facebook commenting system. You will need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment.

« A message from Joe Garcia: $550k cash haul shows he's tough to beat in battle for House | Main | Miami lawmakers question Beyoncé, Jay-Z trip to Cuba »

Miami-Dade baggage wrap fight moves to court


The company that lost a lucrative contract to wrap baggage at Miami International Airport has re-filed a lawsuit contending that Miami-Dade commissioners violated the county's procurement process in awarding the concession to the second-place bidder.

TrueStar USA had submitted the same complaint in court last month, seeking an injunction to prohibit the county from executing the contract with Safe Wrap, the firm chosen by the commission. The court dismissed the complaint as premature because Mayor Carlos Gimenez vetoed the commission's action.

But last week, commissioners swiftly overrode that veto, upholding their choice. TrueStar brought back its complaint Friday. Later that same day, Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Jennifer Bailey set an emergency hearing for next week, ordering "that the status quo be maintained" until further court action.

TrueStar argues that it should have been awarded the contract because it offered MIA more money, in the form of a minimum annual payment or a percentage of monthly gross revenues, whichever number is higher. The company received a higher overall score from a bid scoring committee, and a recommendation to the commission from Gimenez's administration. The commission acted in "an arbitrary and capricious manner," the complaint says.

But commissioners, who have the final say in contract awards, got Safe Wrap to agree to match TrueStar's minimum annual payment (though not the percentage). Though Gimenez countered that the lower Safe Wrap percentage would cost MIA money, the commission said it could not trust TrueStar because, as the airport's current vendor, it requested a reduction to its minimum fee last year. The board reluctantly agreed, with the condition that the county would re-bid the contract.