The backers of a Florida medical-marijuana initiative have rewritten their proposed constitutional amendment and now face the toughest of paths to even get on the 2014 ballot.
After consulting with high-powered lawyers and conducting polls and focus groups, People United for Medical Marijuana decided to scrap its original initiative out of a fear that it wouldn’t survive the courts or might not withstand the attacks of anti-drug activists.
A new survey conducted by the group, nicknamed PUFMM, shows the latest proposal could garner as much as 71 percent of the vote. It takes 60 percent of voters to approve a state constitutional amendment.
But whether medical pot will ever be decided by voters in next year’s election is an open question.
By proposing new language, approved Wednesday by the state, PUFMM discarded tens of thousands of petition signatures from voters who wanted to get medical marijuana on the ballot.
Now the process begins again.
“We’re starting out with no signatures in the bank and we need more than 683,000 signatures just to make the ballot,” said Ben Pollara, treasurer for the group, nicknamed PUFMM.
But PUFMM will need to gather far more than the required 683,149 valid voter signatures — perhaps as many as 1 million — because not every petition it submits to election officials for verification will come from a registered voter.
There’s not much time.
The petition verification deadline is Feb. 1, 2104. But officials and campaign experts say the bulk of the petitions need to be submitted well before the deadline to give elections officials enough time to verify the voter signatures.
To gather so many signatures in such a short period of time, the group will need to hire paid petition gathers, who could charge as much as $4 per petition. Maximum likely cost: $4 million.
And there’s yet another hurdle. Once the group gathers 10 percent of the valid signatures needed to qualify for the ballot, it needs to submit the language to the Florida Supreme Court, which will decide whether the language is misleading or impermissibly tackles multiple subjects instead of just one issue.
The original ballot summary listed a number of specific diseases, but still said physicians could recommend medical pot uses for other purposes.