« Broward sets new voting precinct sizes | Main | Scott and Bondi file suit over Georgia's water use »

PSC approves FPL's nuke fee request in record time

In record time on Tuesday, the Florida Public Service Commission approved charging Florida Power & Light  customers $43.5 million in 2014 for nuclear-power projects.

The fee will amount to 43 cents per 1,000 kilowatt hours of electricity, a drop of $1.19 from the current charge. It will be the seventh year the company has been able to use a law intended to help the company invest in the costly endeavor of building future nuclear power plants by collecting the money from customers to pay for upgrades to its existing plants.

The fees approved by the commission on Tuesday would allow FPL to put only $17 million into the cost of obtaining a license for two new reactors at the company's Turkey Point power plant complex in Miami-Dade County. The remaining estimated $26 million will be spent on upgrading existing projects.

Before legislators approved the so-called "advanced nuclear cost recovery" provision, utility companies were required to make the improvements and then seek permission from regulators to charge customers for it after the fact. By collecting the money in advance, regulators said Tuesday they believe FPL is operating efficiently. 

The PSC released this press release:

TALLAHASSEE – The Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) today approved recovery of $43.4 million for construction of planned nuclear generation and improvements to existing nuclear units for Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), effective January 2014. 

Recovery amounts include costs for construction investments in FPL’s planned Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 and adding generation capacity to existing Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 and St. Lucie Units 1 & 2.  When completed, these projects are expected to add approximately 2,722 megawatts of new nuclear generation to FPL’s system, enough energy to power 1.4 million homes.

FPL residential customers using 1,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity will see a monthly charge of approximately 46-cents beginning in January 2014, reflecting a $1.19 decrease from the current charge.  As a result of revisions to Florida Statute 366.93 by the 2013 Legislature, FPL’s total recovery was reduced by $1.6 million due to adjustments in calculating carrying costs.

Recovery amounts approved today were thoroughly reviewed by Commissioners on August 5, when the utilities and consumer groups testified on actual and estimated nuclear construction project costs during the PSC’s annual nuclear cost recovery hearing.

As part of a larger settlement involving other PSC docketed cases, Duke Energy Florida’s (DEF) 2014 nuclear cost recovery amount was approved by the Commission during the August 5 hearing.  DEF residential customers using 1,000 kWh will see a monthly charge of approximately $5.62 beginning in January, reflecting an 89-cent increase from the current charge.

For more information, visit the PSC’s website, www.floridapsc.com.

 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

chenzerino

The PSC rubberstamp must be on speed dial.

Nancy Argenziano

Not surprised that the utility lackeys,the commissioners, did this. Thank your nearest elected legislator as they reappointed these bums. The Republicans in charge are to blame as they are the majority power and they owe their souls to the mega corporations that own them. Get rid of the PSC and save lots of tax dollars, and put it on the shoulders of the elected sell out buffoons. Do you have any confidence in the so called PUBLIC Service Commission to do the fair thing? If so, I have some swamp land to sell you.

Timothy Hites

$43 million for a power point presentation about a Nuke plant they never intended to build.

Randall Hobbs

What is record time? Does this record time take into consideration how much time was spent going through the record prior to this public meeting? Leading with such an ambiguous headline is manipulative (at most) or lazy (at best) without further analysis.

Anyone that works in public regulation knows that the majority of time deliberating on a matter and going through record occurs before the final public vote. If this article were written in an unbiased fashion, that would have been made it more clear.

The comments to this entry are closed.