« After Obamacare signup, Marco Rubio defends $10k subsidy some Republicans call "special deal" | Main | Insurance firm recruits nonprofits to sell Obamacare as a fundraiser »

FPL wants customers to pay for new plants under emissions law

Fpl plantWhen the federal government issued new air quality guidelines in 2010 to protect the elderly, children, and people with asthma from nitrogen oxide emissions, Florida Power & Light took notice.

The 48 gas turbines that the company uses to fire up quickly during peak demand rely on 1970s-era technology. Although the company touts a record of having power plants that are “67 percent cleaner than the national average,” it also acknowledges that these older so-called “peaker” plants emit some of the most toxic pollutants.

In order to comply with the new standard, FPL decided it was time to replace all of its peak demand turbines between now and 2016 and, in June, it proposed a $822 million project. The costs would be borne by customers based on a monthly fee – FPL estimates it is less than 75-cents a month for customers that use 1,000 kilowatt hours – and added to the portion of the bill used to comply with environmental regulations.

The proposal would allow the company to replace aging generators in Broward and Lee counties, avoid a lengthy rate review by utility regulators, update its emissions technology and still give the company a revenue boost that would allow it to increase its profits.

But not everyone agrees with FPL that this was the right approach and, on Tuesday, FPL will ask the Public Service Commission to dismiss its proposal while it conducts a series of environmental tests. The goal, the company said, is to come back and ask for the rate increase again, once the tests are complete.

“It could be the same project; it could be a different project,’’ said Mark Bubriski, Florida Power & Light spokesman. More here. 

Photo: Walter Michot, Miami Herald

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ed jenkins

We have seen through the years unintelligent citizens are fooled into thinking they can enact feel good and good sounding laws with no consequences. Then they complain when the cost of these senseless laws comes home to roost. Our power companies are privately owned and own all of their assets outright so they should be able to do as they please on their land and if they rightly believe that a certain source of energy is the one that can provide the most reliable, least costly source they should use it without any government interference.

The comments to this entry are closed.