« Movers & Shakers | Main | FPL wants customers to pay for new plants under emissions law »

After Obamacare signup, Marco Rubio defends $10k subsidy some Republicans call "special deal"

@MarcACaputo

Though a staunch Obamacare critic, Sen. Marco Rubio has enrolled his family in one of its health plans and will accept a $10,000 federal subsidy that some fellow Republicans rejected as a "special deal."

Rubio on Monday defended his decision to receive the annual subsidy and said it wasn’t that special.

"It’s an [employer] contribution," Rubio said. "It’s available to every employee of the federal government."

Rubio pointed out that, as a member of Congress, he’s required to enroll in an Affordable Care Act plan if he wants health insurance through his employer, the federal government.

But while Rubio’s position is technically correct —- he is receiving a type of insurance contribution from his employer that’s common in government and the private sector — his decision to accept the subsidy poses political risks for the 2016 GOP presidential hopeful.

Rubio’s decision has drawn fire from Democrats, who charge him with hypocrisy, and puts him at odds with some Republicans who are refusing to accept the federal contribution money in a protest of the Affordable Care Act.

Others have shied away from the subsidy to insulate themselves from political attacks that Congress is enjoying a special perk under Obamacare.

So far, about 10 other senators and a handful of U.S. House members have rejected or avoided receiving the annual subsidy.

Rubio said he would vote to do away with the subsidy if it applied to everyone equally. Until then, he’s keeping the money.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina didn’t want to wait that long. He made a big deal last week when he announced he was enrolling in Obamacare but rejecting the employer contribution.

"I don't think members of Congress should get a special deal," Graham said in a press release. "Obamacare is being pushed on the American people and we should live under it just like everyone else."

More here

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ed jenkins

The readers do not need articles written for them about the fact that a politician has complied with a law even a law as despised by the citizens as this horrible Obama medical expenses law. It may seem like news that a politician has not violated the law given the amount that have broken the law in the past but we do not need stories on this subject and consider a hometown paper a waste of subscription money prints stories on these subjects. As this is the third time this article has been repeated it is time for the Herald to let this reporter go since they cannot find original subjects that inform the readers.

OkeyMor57

I beg to disagree with you ed. If Marco is so incensed by this law, and does not want anything to do with it, then maybe he should put his money where his mouth is and refuse it I will go as far as to say that, as a matter of principle, everybody that oppose the law should refuse the subsidy. All such refusal should be used to expand #MEDICAID so that the burden of paying for ER is lessened for the rest of us who believe #ACA is a good thing.

Ziad K Abdelnour

"Affordable Care Act" roll out isn't Obama's fault. It's what happens when you elect a President without any real-world business experience.

The comments to this entry are closed.