« RPOF files third complaint v. Charlie Crist over Morgan & Morgan | Main | Wilson joins lawmakers in push for greater Twitter campaign to help free kidnapped Nigerian girls »

Decision raises more questions about documents in redistricting case


The trial challenging Florida's newly drawn congressional map ended two weeks ago and the judge could rule at any time on whether the revised boundaries violate the law.

Even so, a First District Court of Appeal opinion issued Thursday could jeopardize the use of 538 pages of confidential documents that were introduced as evidence.

The appeals court voted 5-4 that the Florida Supreme Court should ultimately decide whether the Leon County circuit judge assigned to the case was correct when he gave the plaintiffs in the case — a coalition of citizens groups — access to the secret e-mails, maps and planning documents held by political consultants to Republican legislators.

Now, the Florida Supreme Court will have to decide if it wants to take up the case. If so, the high court could agree with or overturn Circuit Judge Terry Lewis' initial ruling that the secret documents were admissible in court.

Read more here.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ed jenkins

The citizens have already said many times they do not want these cartographers and the group that claims to represent one sex of voters wasting taxpayer confiscated money on these arguments about mundane administrative government procedures. If these people want to waste more time with this then they can take this matter up with their local congressman.


"In a highly unusual move, the 1st District Court of Appeal on Thursday ruled that three judges on the court were wrong when they decided in May that evidence taken from a Gainesville political consulting firm could not be used in a redistricting trial." The three judges on the panel, all of whom were appointed by Republican governors. Enough said.

The comments to this entry are closed.