Note: This blog's templates will be updated this afternoon to a responsive design bringing it in line with MiamiHerald.com.

At that time, we will also change to the Facebook commenting system. You will need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment.

« Sunshine Law takes further hits with new Legislature-approved exemptions | Main | Supporters of state parks tell Rick Scott: 'Veto this bad budget' »

Is the Florida Legislature broken? Why was leadership-built consensus, compromise and open debate on the tough stuff abandoned?

Corcoran and Negron@MaryEllenKlas

Determined to push through a list of priority bills this year, Senate President Joe Negron and House Speaker Richard Corcoran abandoned the difficult and often hard-to-manage job of achieving bipartisan and ideological consensus on education, economic development and state worker bills and instead employed a rule that allowed them to attach their policy bills to the budget package using a series of conforming bills.

The strategy allowed them to force the passage of sweeping policy changes in a way that avoided having to water them down with consensus-driven amendments. It also allowed them to shift the session from one built on a representative democracy -- in which every elected lawmaker had a role to play in the final package of policies they were asked vote on -- to one in which the presiding officers exercised autocratic control by forcing them to vote on take-it or leave-it policy bills.

Is this a sign the system on which the Florida Legislature is built is flawed? Is it broken? If not, why couldn't Florida Legislative leaders drive consensus on a bill that everyone sees, modifies and votes on? 

Is the session too short? Are the issues too complex? Are the leaders too ill-equipped? Has Florida become too diverse to govern?

We take a look at another contentious end to session and break it down here. 

Comments