March 10, 2016

Hillary Clinton attacked Bernie Sanders on immigration including amendment on Minutemen

Immigration policy was a big topic at the Univision-Washington Post Democratic presidential debate in Miami. On several occasions, Hillary Clinton took the opportunity to attack Bernie Sanders’ record on immigration.

At one point, she said, "In 2006, when Sen. Sanders was running for the Senate from Vermont, he voted in the House with hard-line Republicans for indefinite detention for undocumented immigrants, and then he sided with those Republicans to stand with vigilantes known as Minutemen who were taking up outposts along the border to hunt down immigrants."

She later repeated both parts of this charge.

Sanders took issue with Clinton’s statements during the debate. Responding to a question from moderator Jorge Ramos about whether he supported the Minutemen, Sanders said, "Of course not. There was a piece of legislation supported by dozens and dozens of members of the House which codified existing legislation. What the secretary is doing tonight and has done very often is take large pieces of legislation and take pieces out of it."

Many readers asked PolitiFact to take a closer look, so we did. See what we found here.

March 09, 2016

Facebook data shows what Floridians are talking about ahead of Miami Democratic debate

Conversation FLORIDA
@PatriciaMazzei

It may come as no surprise, but Floridians -- at least the ones posting about politics on Facebook -- care a lot about Cuba and immigration.

Those are the top issues Floridians are talking about on the social-media site ahead of Wednesday's Democratic debate in Miami, according to data Facebook shared with the Miami Herald.

The other three leading topics of conversation? The size of government, government ethics, and homeland security and terrorism. Compare that to the chief issues nationally: religion, the economy, immigration, racial issues and taxes.

Facebook also compiled data on which candidates Facebookers were discussing, and how many "interactions" those candidates generated. Here, Florida mirrored the nation.

Between the Democrats, Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders in Facebook interactions. The Republican lineup, from most to least discussed: Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and John Kasich.

February 19, 2016

Marco Rubio now says he'd end Obama protection for young immigrants 'on my first day'

via @learyreports

Marco Rubio now says he would immediately end President Obama’s program shielding young immigrants from deportation.

"I will on my first day in office get rid of it because it's unconstitutional,” Rubio said on CNN Thursday.

The “first day” is notable.

Ted Cruz has attacked Rubio’s immigration position in part because Rubio used more wiggle room in an interview last year with Jorge Ramos of Univision. Then, Rubio said the program would end but he indicated it would not happen right away.

“The reason is that there are already people who have that permission, who are working, who are studying, and I don’t think it would be fair to cancel it suddenly," Rubio said, according to a translation of the interview conducted in Spanish. “But I do think it is going to have to end. And, God willing, it’s going to end because immigration reform is going to pass.”

CNN asked Rubio spokesman Alex Conant about the shift and said he played down the "first day" promise.

"He has always said that DACA is unconstitutional and that it needs to end," Conant said. "As President, he'd stop people signing up for the program immediately."

--ALEX LEARY, Tampa Bay Times

February 17, 2016

February 12, 2016

Listen to Marco Rubio talk about immigration in 2002

via @learyreports

After telling audiences that he’s lived the immigration issue, Marco Rubio outlines a tough-on-security approach that raises the possibility of ISIS invading our homes and strikes this promise: “If we aren’t 100 percent sure who you are and why you’re coming to America, you’re not getting in.”

As he navigates the issue he’s most vulnerable to conservatives on, Rubio’s past keeps surfacing. During the last big terrorism scare — 9/11 — Florida got perhaps the earliest look at Rubio’s more moderate immigration views.

Lawmakers in Tallahassee rushed to make policy after the terrorist attacks. But Rubio expressed caution about going too far and in February 2002, he led an effort to defeat a bill that would have required state colleges and universities to provide law enforcement with information on about 58,000 student visa holders.

“I hope nobody here goes home tonight thinking that we’re Captain America and that we’re saving the world by filing this legislation,” Rubio said during a committee meeting. He doubted the bill would make the country safer and “in fact, it’s just a part of what appears to be a pattern of legislation after legislation that unfairly targets a group of people by vast and overwhelming majority, statistically speaking, is here to make their lives better and to contribute to the well-being of this country and not the other direction.”

--ALEX LEARY, Tampa Bay Times

February 04, 2016

Jeb Bush says Miami isn't the same kind of 'sanctuary city' as San Francisco

@PatriciaMazzei

TILTON, N.H. -- Miami's two Republican presidential candidates, Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, both get applause when they campaign against federal funding for so-called "sanctuary cities," where local law-enforcement agencies limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

But advocates consider their home county of Miami-Dade to be such a sanctuary. And legislation passed by the Florida House on Wednesday that would ban the practice would, by the House staff's own analysis, affect Miami-Dade.

Asked about the state legislation while campaigning in New Hampshire on Thursday, Bush, a former Florida governor, cautioned against painting all cities and counties with too wide a brush.

"Miami-Dade County's version of a sanctuary city may be different than the one that exists in San Francisco, where they released convicted felons into the community rather than apply federal law," Bush said. "I don't think Miami-Dade was doing that. So you've got to be careful about the conversation."

He reiterated, however, that it shouldn't be OK for a local police department to defy immigration law. (The way Miami-Dade's policy works is that the police department cooperates with the feds on some immigration cases, but does not detain people flagged as being in the country illegally indefinitely.)

"I don't think there should be a violation of federal law by local communities knowingly doing it," Bush said. "There should be some restrictions. The idea of restricting federal law-enforcement dollars for communities that violate federal law and endanger their communities is appropriate.

"I don't think Miami-Dade County does that, though."

January 15, 2016

Marco Rubio names 'desperate' Jeb Bush in 1 of 2 new TV ads on immigration

@PatriciaMazzei

How damaging could his previous support for comprehensive immigration reform be for Marco Rubio?

The Florida senator released not one but two TV ads Friday defending his position -- and pushing back on Jeb Bush, whose allied super PAC has portrayed Rubio as an immigration flip-flopper.

"We all see what's happening: Jeb Bush is desperate and spending millions on false attacks," Rubio says in one of the ads. "Don't fall for it. When I'm president there will be no amnesty."

Both Rubio and his allied super PAC have appeared eager to counter the Bush camp's jabs, even though Bush is trailing Rubio in polls. Bush said in Thursday's debate that his rivals should be less concerned with what "wild and woolly" attack ads say.

"Everybody's record's going to be scrutinized, and at the end of the day, we need to be united behind the winner so we can defeat Hillary Clinton, because she is a disaster," he said.

Ted Cruz took Rubio to task on immigration Thursday, a few days after Rubio began talking on the campaign trail about how immigration is now a bigger national-security issue.

Rubio's campaign says both ads will air in Iowa.

 

 

The fiery Marco Rubio-Ted Cruz exchange buried at the end of Thursday's debate

@PatriciaMazzei

One of Marco Rubio's strongest moments -- in terms of rhetoric, anyway -- in Thursday night's Republican presidential debate came in overtime.

Around 11 p.m., the usual end time for debates, Rubio got asked about immigration, one of his weak spots among GOP primary voters. He gave what has become his latest argument on the issue, that legal immigration must be reviewed in light of the ISIS terrorist group's latest attacks.

"The issue is a dramatically different issue than it was 24 months ago," contended Rubio, one of the sponsors of 2013 immigration-reform legislation in the U.S. Senate. "Twenty-four months ago, 36 months ago, you did not have a group of radical crazies named ISIS who were burning people in cages and recruiting people to enter our country legally."

Rubio rival Ted Cruz spied an opening and took it.

"Radical Islamic terrorism was not invented 24 months ago; 24 months ago, we had Al Qaida," he said. "We had Boko Haram. We had Hamas. We had Hezbollah. We had Iran putting operatives in South America and Central America."

Cruz had put Rubio on the defensive on an issue Rubio has struggled with for years -- and will apparently continue to wrangle with. But Rubio nevertheless came right back at him.

Continue reading "The fiery Marco Rubio-Ted Cruz exchange buried at the end of Thursday's debate" »

January 13, 2016

Pro-Ted Cruz super PAC knocks Marco Rubio on immigration

@PatriciaMazzei

A new web video by a super PAC supporting Ted Cruz's presidential bid uses Marco Rubio's own words -- and those of fellow senators who worked with him on immigration reform -- to criticize Rubio's support of a path to citizenship for people in the country illegally.

The super PAC behind the video, Keep the Promise I, is different from the super PAC that in November accused Rubio of backing "amnesty" in another web video.

 

January 12, 2016

In GOP State of the Union responses, different messages in English and Spanish on immigration

@PatriciaMazzei

The Republican Party's immigration split was reflected Tuesday in the two responses hand-picked party members gave -- one in English, one in Spanish -- to President Obama's final State of the Union address. The Spanish version, offered by a Cuban-American congressman from Miami, was decidedly softer.

Here's what South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley said in English:

No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country.

At the same time, that does not mean we just flat out open our borders. We can’t do that. We cannot continue to allow immigrants to come here illegally. And in this age of terrorism, we must not let in refugees whose intentions cannot be determined.

We must fix our broken immigration system. That means stopping illegal immigration. And it means welcoming properly vetted legal immigrants, regardless of their race or religion. Just like we have for centuries.

I have no doubt that if we act with proper focus, we can protect our borders, our sovereignty and our citizens, all while remaining true to America’s noblest legacies.

Here's what Miami Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart said in Spanish (translation is ours):

No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love the United States should ever feel unwelcome in this country. It's not who we are.

At the same time, it's obvious that our immigration system needs to be reformed. The current system puts our national security at risk and is an obstacle for our economy.

It's essential that we find a legislative solution to protect our nation, defend our borders, offer a permanent and human solution to those who live in the shadows, respect the rule of law, modernize the visa system and push the economy forward.

I have no doubt that if we work together, we can achieve this and continue to be faithful to the noblest legacies of the United States.

There were other differences in the speeches as well. Haley and Diaz-Balart each briefly mentioned their personal backgrounds, which are obviously not the same. Haley spoke about the Charleston shooting and removal of the Confederate flag (which she referred to only as a "symbol that was being used to divide us") while Diaz-Balart spoke more generally about "tragedies" in South Carolina and California. Diaz-Balart didn't make veiled references to presidential front-runner Donald Trump, while Haley warned against the "noise" in politics.

And Diaz-Balart mentioned Cuba and Venezuela:

Unfortunately, there are still countries where basic liberties are not respected and were governments don't represent their people. Mullahs in Iran, devoted to radical Islam and with nuclear ambitions, prohibit dissidence and jail independent journalists as 'spies.' In North Korea, the people remain isolated from the rest of the world without Internet access or mass media. And here, in our own hemisphere, the Cuban people have not had a free election in more than 57 years, and political detentions and oppression keep increasing. And the Venezuelan people suffers the existence of political prisoners and corruption in the most important democratic institutions.