September 30, 2013

Congressional inaction -- on flood insurance -- also spawns trouble Oct. 1

On the same day the federal government grinds to a halt, more than 268,000 Florida homeowners will face a hit to their pocketbooks because of federal inaction on another front — rising flood insurance rates.

Gov. Rick Scott, Chief Financial Officer Jeff Atwater and Sen. Bill Nelson have appealed to congressional leaders to delay the Oct. 1 start date of a key provision of the 2012 Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act, a new law that phases out subsidies on older properties in flood zones. Scott is planning a news conference in Clearwater on Tuesday to demand Congress fix “the unfair national flood insurance rate hikes on Florida families.”

Under the law, 13 percent of the 2 million homeowners who carry flood insurance in Florida will be affected by the rate increase — compared to 20 percent of all policyholders nationwide.

Those homeowners will see their rates rise 25 percent upon renewal until they decide to sell their homes, then the new buyer will have to pay the full cost of that insurance — in some cases as much as 3,000 percent more than current rates — to reflect the true flood risk of their property.

The result is having a chilling effect on real estate sales as buyers balk at closing on purchases of older homes that now carry the subsidized rates, said John Sebree, senior vice president at the Florida Realtors Association. Story here. 

September 26, 2013

Rubio remains non-committal to flood insurance delay but wants 'a better way'

By Alex Leary

Sen. Marco Rubio says he doesn't want to see flood insurance rates go up on Floridians but he doesn't like the proposals kicking around Congress to prevent the spikes.

"While we should pursue all options, I am concerned that some of these proposals do not offer long term solutions, or in the case of the House of Representatives’ language, only address rate changes relating to flood maps and not the imminent rate increases facing some policy holders in Florida," Rubio wrote in a letter today to Gov. Rick Scott and Florida CFO Jeff Atwater. "That is why l will continue working with my colleagues on solutions that work for Florida families, ensure affordability, and preserve a path to solvency. We must find a better way, and I welcome your feedback and assistance in this effort.

Sen. Bill Nelson has legislation to prevent the offset the increases, which go into effect Oct. 1, but Rubio has not signed on. Nelson wrote his own letter this week to Scott and Atwater saying he needed their help getting Republican support (Rubio?).

Atwater today sent Nelson a letter accusing him of partisanship. "I am very concerned by your reference to the 'current state of gridlock in Congress caused by a small minority' that is preventing corrective legislation from  being passed and your indication that you need Governor Scott and I to convince Republicans to get this done," Atwater wrote.

"We are facing these rate hikes not because of a small minority that helped pass a bill. Rather, a large majority in Washington voted for the present legislation, doing so without warning their constituents of its consequences. In fact, not a single democrat in the House or Senate voted against the current policy that is the source of the rate hikes. The small minority when this policy passed were Republicans who voted against the bill.”

Below, Rubio's full letter. The limited government Republican may be in a bind on this one. While the flood hikes are unpopular in Florida, others say the practice of holding rates low, despite greater risk, is a costly government subsidy.

Dear Governor Scott and CFO Atwater, 

Thank you both for writing me and sharing your concerns about the National Flood Insurance Program and the rate increases that some Floridians are facing. Rest assured that l am committed to working with my colleagues to prevent the massive rate hikes and provide a long-term  

Over the last several weeks, l have heard legitimate concerns from thousands of Floridians and people who represent them, and l am increasingly concerned that the scheduled rate increases would have a devastating impact on Florida’s economy and housing market. I oppose these sharp rate increases because they will hurt working families by throwing another obstacle to economic 
prosperity and security in their way. 

There is no doubt that we should reform the NFIP and bring financial stability to the program, but there must be a more sensible way to do it. We must enact reforms that ensure manageable rate increases and give working families adequate time to plan for unavoidable rate increases, provide phased in rate increases to avoid devastating our real estate markets, and clarify 
the premium adjustments that Floridians could face. 

As you both reference, proposals have been put forward in Congress to delay rate increases. While we should pursue all options, I am concerned that some of these proposals do not offer long term solutions, or in the case ofthe House of Representatives’ language, only address rate changes relating to flood maps and not the imminent rate increases facing some policy holders in Florida. 
That is why l will continue working with my colleagues on solutions that work for Florida families, ensure affordability, and preserve a path to solvency. We must find a better way, and I welcome your feedback and assistance in this effort.

September 24, 2013

Nelson to Scott: Help me lobby Republicans for flood insurance delay

With the Oct. 1 deadline bearing down on Florida homeowners who face hefty increases on their flood insurance, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson asked Gov. Rick Scott and Chief Financial Officer Jeff Atwater on Tuesday to help him lobby to win support for a delay in the next week.

Nelson included a copy of his proposed legislation and wrote, "but the current state of gridlock in Congress, caused by a small minority, has prevented us from getting much of anything passed."

Here is his letter: 

Continue reading "Nelson to Scott: Help me lobby Republicans for flood insurance delay" »

September 21, 2013

As Citizens insurance denies claims, it racks up attorneys' fees

Citizens Property Insurance Co. will be raising its rates for the third time next year and the proceeds will cover more than claims:

They’ll also pay attorneys’ fees — now averaging an estimated $2 million each month — as policyholders battle over getting their claims paid.

Between January 2011 and June 2013, Citizens has spent more than $16 million on lawyers from 177 different law firms who have successfully challenged the state’s largest insurance company on behalf of policyholders. Citizens collects $2.2 billion in annual premiums and has an administrative operating budget of $205 million.

The data was compiled by the state-run insurer at the request of Rep. Frank Artiles, R-Miami, a licensed general contractor and appraiser who has been one of the Legislature’s most vocal critics of Citizens. He and several plaintiffs lawyers estimate that Citizens has spent a comparable amount on defense attorneys’, with total litigation costs exceeding $30 million a year, but the company does not have that data available.

"How can you ask me to increase my premiums when you are wasting away my premiums in litigation?" asked Artiles, who wants the Legislature to force Citizens’ board of directors to keep the company’s legal costs in check. "How can you function as a board when you cannot control your costs?" Story here.


Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/09/21/3637396/citizens-racks-up-millions-in.html#storylink=cpy

September 18, 2013

Fugate tells Congress: It's up to you to stop rate increases for flood insurance

 Craig FugateCongress must rewrite the federal flood control act  if it wants to spare homeowners from skyrocketing rate increases, the nation’s top disaster official told a Senate committee Wednesday, saying he doesn’t have the authority to stop it.

“Let me put my cards on the table: I need your help,’’ said Craig Fugate, head of the Federal Emergency Management Administration at a hearing of the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee on Wednesday.

Fugate said that despite indications that many homeowners could face massive rate increases for their homes in flood prone areas of the nation starting Oct. 1, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 included no provisions for affordability -- and he can't change that.

“Without some additional legislative support, there is no provision for affordability in this bill,’’ he said.

Fugate told the committee that he supported some modification because he has “found very little leeway as to how we can address affordability under the act.”  

“I fully believe we should stop subsidizing risk as we go forward for new construction for second homes…but we need to look at not putting people out of their homes because flood insurance is too expensive.”

The hearing was called by senators who are increasingly alarmed by estimated rate increases for homeowners as a result of the act. With nearly 2 million homeowners covered under the act, Florida may be one of the hardest hit states in the nation. 

Continue reading "Fugate tells Congress: It's up to you to stop rate increases for flood insurance" »

Scott pens letter to Rubio and Nelson urging delay in flood insurance hikes

As the U.S. Senate Banking Committee plans a hearing today on the planned rate hike on flood insurance policies, Gov. Rick Scott is urging Florida's senators to push for a delay and an extension in the federal subsidies.

"In cases where new maps move a property into a flood zone, homeowners may find it impossible to sell their properties to a new owner who will be shocked with the massive premium increases required to secure a mortgage,'' Scott wrote in a letter to U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio. "This unfair consequence could devastate parts of Florida's real estate market, stymie Florida's economic recovery, and diminish the state's tax base."

Under the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, flood insurance rates will rise about 20 percent annually beginning Oct. 1 for homes in older, flood-zone areas that have previously enjoyed subsidized rate. The rate increases will continue until their premiums reflect the full market risk.

The rate increases are intended to keep the national flood insurance program from spiraling into insolvency by phasing out lower, subsidized rates for older properties in flood zones.

Continue reading "Scott pens letter to Rubio and Nelson urging delay in flood insurance hikes" »

September 11, 2013

Report: Thousands of Citizens policies held by out-of-staters homeowners

When Citizens Property Insurance sends out its monthly customer bills, only 31 percent of them go to the same house that is insured.

The rest go to other mailboxes in Florida — and around the globe, according to data analyzed by the American Consumer Institute of Citizen Research.

More than 19,000 bills go to people who live in Canada, nearly 27,000 go to New Yorkers, almost 12,000 go to folks in New Jersey and hundreds more go to England, Germany and France.

From Singapore and China, to South Africa and Luxembourg, Florida’s state-run insurance company is providing subsidized insurance coverage to 22,775 property owners who reside abroad. Another 176,465 policies go to homeowners with primary addresses in other states, the study found. Story here. 

At least 1 million of the nearly 1.3 million monthly bills for homeowners policies stay in Florida, but that includes an estimated 500,000 policies that go to addresses different from the property that is insured.

As Florida grapples with how to lower the cost of homeowners insurance along its hurricane alley, the out-of-state subsidies are a luxury it cannot afford, said Steve Pociask, president of the Washington, D.C.-based think tank that reviewed Citizens’ billing lists.

“It all comes down to affordability,’’ he said. “People who live here and have their primary homes insured here are teachers, police, service workers and they are being stung by higher prices. while 27,000 people who have their bills sent to New York are getting subsidized insurance. Why do we want to subsidize these folks?’’

The inequities are enough to prompt Sen. David Simmons, the chairman of the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee to draft legislation to require that out-of-state policyholders whose second homes or vacation are insured by Citizens no longer receive subsidized rates.

Continue reading "Report: Thousands of Citizens policies held by out-of-staters homeowners" »

September 09, 2013

Regulators approve 6.3 percent average hike for Citizens policyholders

Homeowners who have policies with Citizens Property Insurance Corp. will see their premiums rise an average of 6.3 percent next year, the fifth consecutive increase in rates from the state-run insurer.

The average premium increase approved Monday by the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation comes on the heels of a 10.8 percent hike approved last year, but is less than the 7.9 percent sought by Citizens as part of its aggressive attempt to shed policies.

Homeowners with standard “multi-peril” lines will pay an additional $111 on average --  4.4 percent higher than current average rates -- when their policy renews next year. Those with wind-only residential policies will pay an average increase of $265 more, or 10.5 percent, and businesses with commercial lines coverage will see a 10 percent hike.

Since 2009, rates have risen 43 percent for Citizens’ standard homeowners policies and officials say the company’s rates are still below market. 

"We are grateful to OIR for its diligence in reviewing Citizens' 2014 rates and pleased that it has agreed with our overall approach," said Citizens President and CEO Barry Gilway in a statement. "The agency’s action will allow Citizens to continue providing quality service to our 1.2 million policyholders while reducing the risk of assessments on all Floridians." 

Continue reading "Regulators approve 6.3 percent average hike for Citizens policyholders" »

Rollins resigns from Citizens board to explore returning to the company

John RollinsJohn Rollins, an insurance analytics guru who was appointed to Citizens Board of directors by Gov. Rick Scott two years ago, submitted his resignation from the board today in a letter to the governor.

Rollins, 43, told the Herald/Times that he resigned to avoid any ethical breaches as he considers returning to Citizens as part of the company's reorganization. Rollins, president of Rollins Analytics Inc. in High Springs, served as chairman of the board's Actuarial and Underwriting Subcommittee. He previously served as director of corporate analytics at Citizens Property Insurance Corporation from 2006 to 2007.

"I've accomplished a lot and the board has accomplished a lot,'' Rollins said in an interview. "There is a reorganization of the company and it's possible I would have a place in that reorganization. It's also possible there may be opportunities in the private insurance market."

Continue reading "Rollins resigns from Citizens board to explore returning to the company" »

As Citizens sheds policies, customers face new headaches

In the next month, almost 400,000 people whose homes are covered by the state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corp. will get a letter in the mail from another insurance company taking over their homeowners’ insurance coverage by Nov. 5.

Policyholders will have two options:

Say no, and remain with Citizens, taking a chance that their options will become even more limited beginning in January, when a $44.9 million clearinghouse comes online to allow insurance agents in the private market to handpick Citizens policies.

Or say yes, accepting the coverage from the so-called “takeout” company, one of 10 smaller carriers. Unlike Citizens, those companies have the right to raise insurance premiums by unlimited amounts when the policies come up for renewal.

It’s all part of the aggressive and controversial push by Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Legislature to shed Citizens Property Insurance of its 1.2 million state-subsidized policies. Under current law, if Citizens falls short of the cash it needs to pay its claims after a massive storm, policyholders of other lines of insurance and state taxpayers will be assessed fees to foot the bill.

But as Citizens shifts policies to the private market, the bottom line for homeowners is that costs will rise. Private companies don’t face the same rate caps as those imposed on Citizens, and they don’t benefit from the taxpayer-backed system. Story here.

A breakout of the targeted number of policies by local county here:

Continue reading "As Citizens sheds policies, customers face new headaches" »