Fishing "barguments"
A colleague of mine in the business department at the Miami Herald recently wrote a book on "Barguments" -- seemingly unwinnable debates over sometimes trivial issues that consume hours spent in bars. An example of a "bargument" would be whether sailing is more of a sport than auto racing. Debaters on both sides are likely to be equally passionate, but probably could never convince their opponent of their "rightness".
That got me to thinking about unwinnable fishing arguments, especially those pertaining to our diverse South Florida fisheries. So I will now put forth my examples of fishing barguments. You are free to add yours, which likely will be more original and thought-provoking than mine, since I may be a little too close to the issue:
1) Who is the better South Florida sailfisherman -- captain Ray Rosher or captain John "Louie" Dudas?
2) Which takes more skill, preparation and local knowledge: kite fishing for sails or flats fishing for tarpon?
3) Should the harvest of goliath grouper be re-opened to recreational anglers?
4) Which is the smartest fish in the ocean -- examples: gray snapper, snook, tarpon? Which is the dumbest -- examples: dolphin, cobia, jack crevalle?
5) And probably the most contentious of all -- overall, are men better anglers than women?
Please submit your comments and add barguments of your own.
Posted by Susan Cocking at 12:31 PM on March 25, 2008 in Fishing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

