A whimsical and light-hearted spin on a serious story of corporate whistleblowing, The Informant! is the movie Erin Brockovich might have been if director Steven Soderbergh had been smoking some funny weed on the set (and if Brockovich has been a compulsive liar). Everything about The Informant! - from Marvin Hamlisch's carnival-funhouse score to the exclamation mark added to the title of Kurt Eichenwald's nonfiction book on which the film is based - hints at daffiness.
Soderbergh has taken Scott Z. Burns' script, which on paper must have read like a straightforward thriller, and given it an unexpected, and at times inexplicable, comic spin. Nothing that happens in The Informant! technically qualifies as comedy. But Soderbergh's off-kilter take on the material, and the gradual way in which he peels away the many, many layers of his protagonist, keep you smiling throughout.
The director is helped considerably by a terrific bit of dryly funny acting from a chunky Matt Damon, who wields reams of dialogue here as efficiently as he dispatched baddies in the Bourne pictures. The actor gained 30 pounds for the role of Mark Whitacre, a former biochemist who helped concoct a profitable additive for the food conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and by 1992 had transferred to its accounting department.
When Whitacre informs his bosses that a Japanese client is trying to extort $10 million from ADM, they call in the FBI. But Whitacre, concerned that the case could broaden and potentially taint him, secretly reaches out to two agents (Scott Bakula and Joel McHale) and tells them about a world-wide price-fixing scheme at the company.
Right from the start, The Informant! makes us privy to Whitacre's random thoughts via voiceover, clueing us in from the outset that there's something not quite right with this otherwise seemingly brilliant and sane man (''Paranoid is what people who are trying to take advantage of you call you. I read that in an in-flight magazine''). The trouble with Whitacre, which becomes clearer as the investigation stretches into years, throws a gigantic wrinkle into the otherwise familiar story of someone who dares take on a powerful corporation.
Soderbergh's decision to emphasize the loopier aspects of the case does not detract from the story's fascinating bizarreness, and there are moments late in the film when Whitacre's increasingly desperate plight becomes genuinely affecting. The Informant! may be cartoonish, but it is a cartoon inhabited by real people. Some of them just happen to be certifiably nuts.


On ''Dune,'' ''Shadowland'' and trying to film unfilmable novels
Berg said he must now figure out how to whittle down that screenplay into a manageable, feature-length film "without offending the purists ... filmmakers have struggled [in the past] because it's a very complicated book to crack."
Berg also promises a radically different Dune than we've previously seen on movie and TV screens.
Ted, one of the friends who went with me to see the awesome Springsteen show on Sunday, is a hardcore Dune/Frank Herbert fan. On the way to the concert, we happened to be talking about the book and what he liked best about it, and none of what he said bears any relation to what Berg is describing. Maybe that's why Ted said he has no interest in ever seeing a Dune film adaptation, because the movie that is in his head will always trump whatever an actual filmmaker comes up with.
I've always thought Shadowland would make a sensational movie, except it would have to be R-rated and about four hours long (also, I would need to be the one who directed it). Shadowland also deals with teens and magic, so a film made today would forever be compared to Harry Potter, except this one is much, much darker. Although the novel was unfilmable 29 years ago, it would be a cakewalk with contemporary CGI. Still, I don't think a Shadowland movie is ever going to happen, post-Potter. And I'm totally fine with that.
I got to interview Straub at his home in Manhattan's Upper West Side a few years ago. Even though I was there to talk about his new book, I immediately started babbling about Shadowland and asked him why no one had ever turned it into a film. He told me many had tried but they all eventually gave up, because no one could lick the screenplay, which is pretty much the problem with Dune.
September 16, 2009 in Commentary, News | Permalink | Comments (5)