« Verbal job offers -- beware. | Main | Is texting, talking while driving crucial to work life balance? »

Underemployment -- so sad!

This weekend I read an article that had me riveted. If you haven't read it, you absolutely should. The topic: underemployment. It made me think about whether having a job way beneath your qualifications is better or worse than not having a job at all.

The original article ran in the St. Petersburg Times. Just the introduction alone is compelling the whole story: " Don Gould clocked in at the Publix here in central Pasco County. The green computer font on the small black screen told him to BEGIN SHIFT.

Gould is 46, has been married 21 years and is the father of three boys. Three years ago, he was living in Indiana, managing a small design company and making a six-figure salary.

Now he's living in Wesley Chapel near Tampa making $8.25 an hour. Publix calls him a front service clerk.

"I used to be a big shot,'' he said one day last week. ``Now I'm just, `Hey, bag boy.' '' Gould is part of the large swath of the humbled underemployed -- people who during the recession have gone from highly educated and highly paid to paper or plastic. 

Gould explained why he's doing the same thing he did for pocket money when he was 17. His sons are 18, 16 and 12. ``I want to be a role model by showing by example that no job is undignified.''

Don gould


 I asked one of my friends what she though of the story. "I honestly didn't' know it was as bad as it was out there."

Ask someone who has endured unemployment in the last year and they will tell you it's bad out there. If you're a parent, it can be devastating day after day to have your kids see you search for a job with no results. I recently spoke to a recruiter who told me some companies won't even look at a job candidate who has been out of work for a year or more. Personally, I don't think that's indicative at all of a candidate's abilities. But the recruiter's statement did make me realize why people are grabbing any job they can get.

Sue Shellenbarger in the WSJ wrote about a trend toward mini-shifts. "Cast off by mainstream employers or unable to find the job flexibility they need in a corporate setting, millions of workers are taking multiple part-time or freelance jobs, jumping back and forth repeatedly between work, other pursuits and more work." In a way, that's a form of underemployment, too.

Can you really blame workers for piecing together whatever they can to earn a living, or taking jobs beneath their qualifications?

I agree with Gould that showing your child you have a work ethic makes you good role model, regardless of whether the job you take is a huge step backward. I believe that if you need to support your family, no job is beneath you. In my daily struggle for work life balance, I proud that my kids realize that earning a living is important to me --whether I'm a cashier at McDonald's or a newspaper writer. 

What do you think? Does taking a job, any job, making you a good role model for your kids or is it better to hold out for a job that pays well and fit your qualifications regardless of how long you are unemployed? Do you think underemployment is a dangerous route for the laid off workers to accept?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Brahim Derder

Underemployment is not that bad, given the state of the economy today; people have to do “something” to meet their basic needs.
What is BAD and SAD is what has been a TREND in South Florida, especially in Miami, and that is most institutions such as Miami Dade College, FIU, etc, which are subsidized by the Federal and the State Governments funds are engaged, and still are, in illegal hiring of its employees: HISPANICS hire mostly their own family members, relatives, and friends: this practice is illegal; it flies in the face of our constitutional rights (we the none Hispanic people) that are rooted in laws such as Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), supposedly monitored and enforced by EEOC. But, the opportunity for non- Hispanics in Miami is almost none. If you have any doubt try to find a job; actually some employers make speaking Spanish a requirement to even be considered for jobs. I am not a racist- some of my good friends are Hispanic, but I believe that anyone here in this USA should speak English, and penalizing people who do not speak Spanish is ethically wrong, and against the law of this land. I hope things will be based on equal opportunity, not nepotism and favoritism or simply hidden racism.

Cindy Goodman

You are right that having a job is better than not having one at all. This is especially true if you need to pay the bills. But not everyone believes that to be true. I am sure it can be frustrating to find a job in Miami-Dade when you don't speak Spanish. It could be the reason why some people in the area are underemployed.

viagra online

This long-established surname, with variant spellings Gould, Goult and Gold, is of Anglo-Saxon origin, and has two possible sources. Firstly, it may be from a personal name or nickname, derived from the Olde English pre 7th Century "Golda"(masculine), or "Golde"(feminine), meaning "gold", originally given to one with bright golden hair, or perhaps in some cases to a "precious" person.

The comments to this entry are closed.