This blog has moved.

Please visit our new page here

« Movin' and groovin' with the governor in Miami | Main | More Jim Greer depositions »

Herman Cain's risky Sharon Bialek-bashing, part 2

 Herman Cain pledged to tackle "head on" Sharon Bialek's sex-harassment allegations. In doing so, his campaign has issued its second statement raising questions about her credibility. While that would be par for the course in disputes of this nature, Cain is a frontrunner for the presidency. And it's rare to see a campaign actively engaging in this level of confrontation.

Normally, it's left up to surrogates. There's a reason for that: Cases like this are a lose-lose for the accuser and the accused in politics (and probably in life in general). There's often a partisan split between who believes what. But there's also a tendency for a gender divide, which could open up and dog the candidate. Also, the more you fight fire with fire, the more it burns up your campaign, which had labelled these allegations as a distraction less than a day ago.

But Cain's campaign prides itself on being unorthodox. What it might not realize is that orthodoxy exists for a reason.

Here's the statement:

Who is Sharon Bialek?

As Ms. Sharon Bialek has placed herself in the public spotlight through making patently false allegations against Herman Cain, it is only fair to compare her track record alongside Mr. Cain’s.

In stark contrast to Mr. Cain’s four decades spent climbing the corporate ladder rising to the level of CEO at multiple successful business enterprises, Ms. Bialek has taken a far different path.

The fact is that Ms. Bialek has had a long and troubled history, from the courts to personal finances – which may help explain why she has come forward 14 years after an alleged incident with Mr. Cain, powered by celebrity attorney and long term Democrat donor Gloria Allred.

In the courts, Ms. Bialek has had a lengthy record in the Cook County Court system over various civil lawsuits. The following cases on file in Cook County are:

·         2000-M1-707461 Defendant against Broadcare Management
·         2000-M1-714398 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management
·         2000-M1-701522 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management
·         2005-M1-111072 Defendant in lawsuit against Mr. Mark Beatovic.
·         2007-M1-189176 Defendant in lawsuit against Midland Funding.
·         2009-M1-158826 Defendant in lawsuit against Illinois Lending.

Ms. Bialek was also sued in 1999 over a paternity matter according to ABC 7 Chicago (WLS-TV).  Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011.

In personal finances, PACER (Federal Court) records show that Ms. Bialek has filed for bankruptcy in the Northern District of Illinois bankruptcy court in 1991 and 2001. The respective case numbers according to the PACER system are 1:01-bk-22664 and 1:91-bk-23273.

Ms. Bialek has worked for nine employers over the last seventeen years. Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

Curiously, if Ms. Bialek had intended to take legal action, the statute of limitations would have passed a decade ago. 

Which brings up the question of why she would make such reprehensible statements now?

The questions should be – who is financing her legal team, have any media agreed to pay for her story, and has she been offered employment for taking these actions?