This blog has moved.

Please visit our new page here https://www.miamiherald.com/naked-politics/

« Frank Artiles, from defiance to resignation: Four extraordinary days at the Florida Capitol | Main | Charlie Crist to John Morgan: Run for Florida governor »

Rubio denies involvement in Colombian meeting at Mar-a-Lago

via @learyreports

Sen. Marco Rubio on Sunday denied a role in setting up a meeting at Mar-a-Lago between former Colombian presidents opposed to a peace deal.

Appearing on "Meet The Press," Rubio also expressed understanding for President Trump's shifting positions.

"I think when you're running for president, especially someone that's never held elected office, there's one set of things that you may view the world through-- a lens that you may view the world through. Then, you get elected and you get good people. And those good people bring you the facts. And they bring you, "Here's what's going on. Here are our options. Here's what happens if you do this. Here's what happens when you do that." And that reality begins to assert itself. And you have to react to that. You're now the president. You're no longer a candidate. You're not a pundit. You have to actually make decisions that have real impact and consequence. And I think that's what you're seeing here. I think you're seeing a president--

CHUCK TODD:

Do you think he's moving away from maybe the isolationist rhetoric and tendencies that he had as a candidate?

SEN. MARCO RUBIO:

I think he's dealing with the reality of being president of the United States. I think he's dealing with the reality of our options oftentimes on foreign policy are not a choice between a good one and a bad one. It's a choice between two less-than-ideal options.

And you're trying to figure out which is the least harmful of the two. And I think that's something we should be encouraged by, not something that we should be critical of. This whole flip-flop thing is a political thing. It's something people use in campaigns.

But in every other aspect of our life, people change their minds or make different decisions when presented with a set of facts that, perhaps, are different from what they thought. Why should that not be the case, especially for something as important as the presidency?

--ALEX LEARY, Tampa Bay Times

Comments