« Review: ''Did You Hear About the Morgans?'' | Main | Florida Film Critics Circle falls for ''Up in the Air'' »

Review: ''Avatar''


Blue fairies and giant flying lizards: This is, in a nutshell, what Avatar -- James Cameron's eagerly awaited, self-proclaimed cinematic game-changer, the supposed future of movies -- boils down to. OK, so they're not technically fairies. They are a blue-skinned, 10-foot-tall race of vaguely feline aliens known as Na'vi who live on the planet Pandora and have a physical and emotional connection with the natural world. They can literally plug into animals and trees through the nerve endings of their braided ponytails, and they don't just hug trees: They actually meld with them.

 But really, all that's missing are wings and some magical powers to make the Na'vi into mystical beings worthy of Oz. The story of Avatar is rooted in science fiction and fantasy and, inevitably, in Joseph Campbell), but the movie emits a distinct la-la land vibe. If anyone other than Cameron were behind the camera, the film would probably be a disaster of Howard the Duck proportions.


But without Cameron, Avatar would not exist. Not even George Lucas is better than Cameron at incorporating new filmmaking technology into his pictures. Whatever faults Avatar may have -- and there are many -- the movie succeeds in immersing you in a photorealistic, painstakingly detailed world more fully than any science fiction movie before. Watching Avatar in any of its incarnations (the 3D version adds considerable depth and dimension to the image, although the glasses start to grow heavy after the two-hour mark) is an undeniably transporting experience -- a real trip, worth taking for anyone who cares about films. When the ride is over, though, you're still left hungry for a movie.

Like Titanic, Avatar is a 10-cent script writ large and awe-inspiring through sheer directorial vision, but this time, Cameron doesn't have historical events and two remarkable performances to fall back on. Instead, we get Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a paraplegic marine who travels to Pandora via an avatar image that allows him to blend in with the locals. His human bosses -- a short-tempered scientist (Sigourney Weaver) and a short-tempered colonel (Stephen Lang) -- have differing motivations for helping Jake succeed in studying the far-flung scenery.


 On Pandora, Jake befriends a Na'vi warrior (Zoe Saldana) who teaches him the rules of her strange planet -- and also falls in love with him. The pacing in Avatar is surprisingly measured: Cameron takes his time introducing us to the wonders of the planet, gradually peeling back the layers while constantly inventing creatures and landscapes for your eyes to feast on. You watch the first half of Avatar in a state of blissful rapture, because Cameron has the directorial chops to go along with the special-effects trickery (this is an exceptionally well-edited movie). He doles out the eye-candy gradually, and the thrill of discovery sweeps you along.

After about an hour, though, the realization starts to sink in that the story of Avatar isn't going to live up to the complexity of its backdrop. Basically, greedy humans want a mineral found on Pandora and are willing to commit genocide to get it. Avatar is The New World in outer space, or Pocahontas with blue people: The entire movie is a long buildup to a climactic 30-minute action sequence that lives up to Cameron's uncanny knack for placing his heroes in seemingly unwinnable situations (he would have been great at making those old 1950 adverture serials -- but is still, in the end, just a gigantic action sequence,


The genre elements are all there: What critically wounds Avatar is Cameron's inability to write better characters. Most of the personalities in the film are lifted straight out of Aliens, including Michelle Rodriguez's tough Latina jarhead and Giovanni Ribisi's weaselly pencil-pusher. As the villain, Lang overacts maniacally, while Weaver's ill-defined role seems to have suffered in the editing process (Cameron had to whittle Avatar down to 160 minutes to accommodate IMAX theaters).

Worthington and Saldana fare best, even though more than half of his screen time (and all of hers) is spent underneath Cameron's emotion-capture process, which melds the actors' performances with computer-generated images. The love story in Avatar -- the element you'd assume would be the most half-baked -- turns out to be the strongest thread running through this epic picture, which constantly enthralls visually and delivers a number of thrills. But the movie doesn't engage your intellect - or your heart - enough. Cameron's accomplishments as a craftsman here are formidable, but this isn't quite the future of cinema. Avatar is more of a prologue -- evidence that you can trick an audience into surrendering to an artificial world without fixating on the seams. Now we just need a story worth all the trouble.

Avatar opens in theaters on Dec. 18.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


In other words....a typical James Csmeron movie. Perfect. Should be awesome then.

David Sheppard

I saw an early preview viewing of Avatar 3D yesterday evening and can confirm that, in my opinion, this movie is the most amazing experience in cinematic history. For every moment throughout the film you are immersed in a totally believable alien world where all the characters, real and imagined, add to the rich diversity of the creation. Descriptions like unmissable, mindblowing, fantastic, redefining and exceptional are all utterly deserving of this movie that exceeds all the pre-release hype in every departments. I cannont wait to experience it again and wholeheartedly recommend it to every movie-lover. You will not be disappointed.

Bob Roberts

I was sceptical, and yes it does have it's faults, but I can't remember a film that I went to sleep thinking about, and still when I woke up...


Weird. I think it gets worse the more time goes on. Totally rehashed story. If I cared about special effects that much, I'd play video games. But clearly it's a guy thing.

Mike Cooley (UK)

OK, it's not Shakespeare and the main story elements have also been done elsewhere - but that's true of all fiction, isn't it?

Having said that, this film is absolutely amazing (especially in 3D) and shouldn't be missed. It's well worth the ticket price.


The best review ever, 7 out 10, worst cast ever


Rene, I don't want to read your interview until I've seen the movie myself. Do you think this movie should definitely be seen on an IMAX 3-D screen, or is the experience so irritating that watching it in a regular theater is just fine? I wouldn't want to make the mistake of seeing it in a smaller screen, minus the 3-D, if the IMAX experience was truly worth it even with the headache.

Rene Rodriguez

George: I saw the movie on a regular-sized screen, but if I had the choice, I would definitely go through the trouble of seeing it in IMAX, since the visuals are 3/4 of the show.


Definitely worth watching in Imax 3D. Absolutely stunning visuals - a nature lover's fantasy world, with terrific action sequences. But yeah, the script is weak - especially the cardboard cutout depictions of the villains. But totally absorbing anyway. I give it an A-


Hey old people, stop whining about the weak plot. This movie was created was teenager mindset in mind. For teenage world, the plot is more than enough.

ted evans

Movies, as a form of entertainment, are meant to take you out of the everyday. Take you places real or imagined, that you would never go or ever see. To meet people real or imagined you would never meet. AVATAR does that and more. To review this movie and take it apart is stupid. To sit and watch it and leave saying " that was a damn good movie" is the only real thing you can do. When you go to see AVATAR, have no expectations, clear your mind of all you have heard about it. I promise you that after the movie ends , you will leave feeling that you have been on the adventure of your life and that you want to go on that adventure again and again...


Disney in general is rcasit, I'll give you that.But if Pocahontas is rcasit, then maybe that's where the allegations that Avatar is as well are coming from: The fact that it's a rewrite.Just so you know, I'm not saying the movie was terrible- there were several things about it I liked, such as the time spent developing Jake's character, and how he eventually began to question which life was right, which was the dream. I also liked how it was confounded by his continuing to work for the military to gain ground against the Na'vi.Really, I just find the whole Pocahontas rewrite thing more funny than disappointing. My only other regret is that the Na'vi movement animation was stiffer than it should have been.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About The Miami Herald | Advertise